Nobody is trying to disprove the bible, but literalism.
I am dispelling the idea that black people were Israelites enslaved by other black people in Egypt according to common interptetations of Bible script. Leading to a hatred of Ancient Kemet if not Africa as a whole by many brothers and sisters. You need to realise not everybody has Your understanding of race and you do not own the monopoly on how racial ideas should be viewed. These events are of critical importance to many groups of I people I could name.
Give thanks I.
There is nothing pseudo about my question. For Bible believers and literalists if the Bible mentions a Pharoah there is nothing wrong with asking to which Pharoah does it reference? Given the fact we have the full list of Pharoahs from Kemet.
Clearly Biblical history and ancient history itself are certified vast fields of study. Nothing pseudo or buried about it. Questions such as this can reach all the way to the highest level of learning research and critical thought, it is the very definition of scholarship. If you don't feel it is necessary to reason on it then simply, don't... but don't question the validity of such. The asking of who what when where and why behind any given 'story' is a cornerstone of intelligence.
What an unnecessary deflection....
Maybe Nesta should make a seperate thread on his thoughts about what I am 'trying to do.' Just as many others in this forum have done in the past. Yet one thing about Garveys Africa is consistency, in I mission to free the psyche of black people; from the effects of white supremacy.
Back to the question at hand.
Who was the Pharoah? What was the timeline? Who were the Israelites? For Bible studiers only and InI fully buried in the sand of time lol
|
|
