Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List

Here is a link to this page:

The Murder of George Floyd and Subsequent Riots

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 140141 - 150151 - 160161 - 170171 - 180181 - 190191 - 200
201 - 210211
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 6/29/2020 7:57:32 PM

More fake news from Jedi IPX


Different factions each slam fake news

Kremlin, Trump, Taliban Refute NYT Report Claiming Russia Paid Islamic Group to Kill US SOLDIERS

Different factions each slam fake news

The New York Times’ allegation that Russia has been offering reward money to Taliban-linked militants in Afghanistan to kill US and coalition troops has been attacked from all sides, with Moscow, the Trump administration and the Taliban itself saying that the claims aren’t true.

There is no general agreement among US intelligence agencies about the veracity of claims made in the New York Times about Russian military intelligence offering reward money to encourage the killing of US troops in Afghanistan, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany has announced.

“There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations and, in effect, there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence community with regard to the veracity of what’s being reported, and the veracity of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated,” McEnany said, speaking to reporters on Monday.

“The US receives thousands of reports a day on intelligence, and they are subject to strict scrutiny. While the White House does not routinely comment on alleged intelligence or internal deliberations, the CIA director, the National Security Advisor, and the Chief of Staff can confirm that neither the president nor the vice-president were briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence,” she added, referring to the central claim of NYT’s piece that Trump ‘had been briefed’ on the bounty claims but failed to take action.

Pressed on the question, McEnany emphasized that “the president is briefed on verified intelligence,” adding that it was “irresponsible” of NYT to “falsely” report that Trump was briefed.

Earlier Monday, in an interview with Fox News, the White House spokeswoman promised that she would “clear up false reporting” surrounding the ‘Russian bounty’ claims.

On Sunday, Trump said he’s been told by US intelligence agencies that they did not find the recent reports about alleged Russian bounties for US troops in Afghanistan to be credible, adding that the NYT story may be “another fabricated Russia Hoax, maybe by the Fake News @nytimes, wanting to make Republicans look bad.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry called the story’s allegations “nonsense,” adding that amid the Trump-Taliban peace agreement, it was possible that US spies were worried that a lasting peace would put an end to their illicit earnings from drug trafficking and other illegal ventures.

On Monday, Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, reiterated that NYT’s allegations were “false,” and said that “if the US intelligence continues to be accountable to the president, then I propose to focus on the relevant statements of President Trump.”

Congressional Intel Briefing

In her briefing, McEnany also confirmed that the White House has invited eight senior lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, for a briefing on the ‘Russian bounty’ claims, with Chief of Staff Mark Meadows expected to brief them.

On Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the Trump administration of endangering US troops’ lives with its “disturbing silence and inaction” on the NYT report, adding that it was “totally outrageous” for the president “not [to] confront the Russians” and to “kiss up to Putin.” In her Fox interview, McEnany slammed Pelosi for her “entirely off-base” comments, saying that “this president has been very tough on Russia,” having slapped Moscow with new sanctions and closed down consulates.

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/30/2020 10:55:20 AM

There are others like agent H. A lot of these guys are subconsciously racist if not overtly and consciously racist. However... there is a common thread that I have found. They are under the complete and total influence of right wing propaganda under the guise of conspiracy theories. I think you're different. I think you are actually thinking for yourself. We may not always agree, but at least I don't think you're a Q-Zombie.

These people think they're free and they're the ones who are "woke". It drives me insane because they've actually become sheep for propaganda. The conspiracy is that which creates this propaganda in disguise. I've been there done that. I thought the 9/11 conspiracy theories were compelling because of the preparation involved and the connection to the Bin Laden family.

There are some problems with these theories though. Conspiracy theories said he was a US asset. That's false. The US was doing what it's always done; arming one side against another threat. They've been doing that since the colonial days with the Native Americans. But the problem is that this strategy allows them to more easily control or destroy whoever wins. And it doesn't cost them lives. Like that scene in Iron Man when Tony discovers his weapons in the hands of the enemy... its that same strategy. And with 9/11, even though NORAD had trained for it, it only makes sense they would since all they do is train for situations in the air. The only terrorist scenario they could possibly train for is the hijacking of an airplane. It's also possible that Intelligence agencies (not necessarily even US Intelligence) learned of a terrorist plan in advance but not full details of when and where. And without key details there wasn't much they could do to prevent it. And when the hijackers took over they disabled/changed the transponder codes which helped to make the airplanes harder to track. If you think about it and know how these systems work you can see how they were able to carry out their plan. The US isn't invincible. The fact that the TSA was created shows how vulnerable it is. There are other vulnerable systems too but the US had to make a big show of heightened security or else other cells would have been encouraged to strike again. So it may not have been necessary to stop an attack physically, but rather more so intended to psychologically produce the same effect.

But most of us don't think like complex systems of government. So all we see is the surface of things. What happened? Why did it happen? Therefore, because we were truly arrogant about our power in the world we thought we were so untouchable that the only way Bin Laden could have been successful was to be working with our government in the first place. But the truth is that we aren't that competent. America has always focused on its military but not its security. It isn't balanced. Bin Laden knew this. I think the government prefers the conspiracy theories about 9/11 over the reality; that we simply didn't have the power to stop the attack.

After 9/11 conspiracy theories have been evolving and changing. I believe powerful people started to take notice because of just how many people protested in reaction to 9/11. Conspiracy theorist don't realize that this could almost be seen as a kind of census. You could gauge about how big conspiracy theories actually were and the extent to which so many Americans could believe them. So if you are a foreign intelligence agency who wants to influence the American people, you would have saw that response and drooled a little at the prospects. And all you would have to do is pretend to be a leaker like Q anon. After all, the same strategy was employed with wikileaks and the source turned out to be Russian Intelligence. So if you think I'm making this up and this is just another conspiracy theory, well it is, but that's the point. Without real evidence this is all we can do and therefore that can be taken advantage of. Now conspiracy theories are being used to convince Americans not to believe legitimate sources of news and information. People are even turning against academics and universities. It's Putin's wet dream. Why him? Because he feels like the main threat to his (personal) power is the US. The US is the one responsible for tying up his money which is laundered through certain people who are loyal to him. It's a substantial amount of money and so he's motivated to hurt America to the point that we will come to some kind of peace treaty where we leave him alone and he can be president for life with all his wealth and power.

His interest in Trump was because Trump is like a child on the international stage. Trump is willing to change policy based on whether or not he PERSONALLY likes/dislikes someone. This is unheard of because that's usually only something that a king would do, not someone who represents hundreds of millions of people. He's not trying to make things better with full knowledge of our history and historic relationships. He simply lacks the knowledge and ability to care about any of that. But that also makes him easy to manipulate and he doesn't even know when it's happening.

I believe this is also happening with conspiracy theorists. I believe it has been infiltrated by Russian operatives to advance certain theories and help to make them look more legit and increase the "echo" of the echo chamber surrounding them so that they become gospel. Think about it this way. 9/11 conspiracy theorists were never militant and never tried to blow up or poison politicians. It was just "truth seekers". But now? People are being militarized. People are being told that the threat is worse than they could possibly imagine so that they will go out and actually try to kill political leaders and influencers. And in all cases I've seen so far these are all the political enemies of one Vladimir Putin. It is the free press that will always report on what Putin does. And he hates Clinton and Obama because of what they have done to try and thwart him personally. Hillary Clinton is known for attacking his election results, saying "they were dishonest and unfair" and he believes she was sending a signal to his own demonstrators to undermine his power. As for Obama, Putin referred to him using the N-word. So why then wouldn't Putin make friends with a guy who claimed Obama wasn't born in the US and that black people are from "s-hole countries". And truthfully there are tons of white Americans who are equally racist as Trump and Putin so they can see themselves as allies in that respect, even if Putin and Russia don't have a good history with the US.

Meanwhile you have the rise of white nationalism, all seeming fueled by conspiracy theories. Why do people REALLY want a wall? Because of this:

Notice the picture is in FRANCE. So these conspiracy theories are affecting whites around the globe. Who could possibly be a better leader for them than a white/orange man who seems to be both a racist and a conspiracy theorist? A man who brought in Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller.

Conspiracy theories are being used to link people with a common thread. But a lot of the influence is actually in support of fascism. They embrace fascism the same way liberals are toying with socialism and marxism. The fact that antifa exists is purely because they saw the rise of fascism before the rest of the country because they were paying attention to conspiracy theories and social media. The reason people don't like them is because they're actually clashing with nazis at a time that the nazis are more popular than any attempt to prevent them from gaining power.

There have always been not so subtle implications in conspiracy theories indicting the Jews and making claims about Hollywood and Jewish money. But at first it appeared more innocent. Now it has blown up into full on nazism and I believe there are basically levels to it so that it can be compartmentalized to lower resistance. The higher you go, the closer you get to Q, the more you will warm up to Putin and eventually nazis in general. I don't think that will happen with you but you have to keep your mind open and keep love in your heart for all people. White and Black.

When Cornel West passionately told Anderson Cooper (and I'm not sure which part exactly brought Cooper to tears) that black people weren't looking for revenge but rather showing the world how to love in spite of being hated... that was the truth. Often white people misunderstand us because in their minds we should be seeking revenge for what was done to us. But doing so would change who we are and it wouldn't solve the underlying problem that enabled slavery in the first place. We need to love each other and see each other as humans whose lives all have value and whose lives all matter.

Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 6/30/2020 11:33:41 AM


“Whiteness is not humxness,” the statement begins. “infact, white skin is sub-humxn.” The post goes on to present a genetics-based argument centred on melanin and enzyme. “White ppl are recessive genetic defects. this is factual,” the post reads towards the end. “white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce themselves. black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to.”

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/30/2020 11:37:42 AM

Agent H

well if the RUSSIANS say they didn't do it I guess we have to believe them right?


Too easy.

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 6/30/2020 12:40:05 PM

Agent H:

Your first part about defects is likely true but your second about some letter to white people being distributed is fake as hell. No one thinks that way.

On the first point. It is a fact that white people came from black people. However, when I say black people, I'm using the construct that white people created because we all came from humans and those humans had brown skin. Some where lighter and others were darker.

I have often mentioned the San tribe of Africa which is one of the oldest and obviously have the genetic markers of all races. So how did brown skinned people produce a white person? It is not true that whites do not have melanin.

1. melanin reacts to the sun and protects from harmful rays
2. people produce different amounts of melanin
3. negative results are linked to low melanin production

In other words there is no known evolutionary advantage to having less melanin. And there are several diseases ("defects") that that are known to produce white skin. Am I trying to insult white people? Absolutely not. There are different types of melanin and depending on how these are mixed you get different colors. In whites typically the Eumelanin lacks the black subtype.

In the bible this may have been linked to what the bible called leprosy. And it is likely that lepers were driven out into northern camps where they eventually began to multiply separately. If they were thought to be sick, then it makes sense how they could develop into a "race". Because we all do know what happens the vast majority of the time when interracial couples produce children. They simply come out light skinned (black).

There has been a conspiracy theory in the far right that is probably more nazi in nature. Again:

However, no one is actually plotting "white genocide". I would have heard of it by now. This conspiracy theory has been engineered to make other whites afraid of their race ceasing to exist. But here's the catch...

If you're not racist then why do you care about the white race no longer being "White" because your children will be brown? Eventually, if we all have sex our future generations would simply reintegrate the European DNA and everyone would look like Beyonce and Drake (kidding, there would still be ugly people). At that point no one would or even could be racist because everyone would be the same race.

The only reason that one should desire that their race be maintained by interrupting the natural cycles of birth, death, and sexual relationships, is that one has so connected one's self to the identity and description of a particular race that one seeks to advantage that racial construct to the detriment of others. That's a racist.

Explain to me the problem with pure white people no longer existing if no one is actually killing you? I know white mothers with black children. One mother has a white daughter who is so light skinned that you wouldn't even know she was black. Most African Americans have white in us already thanks to both real relationships as well as many rapes. The only difference is that this produces lighter skin black people. Only a very small percentage are so light that they can fully pass as white.

We could have imagined this to be some plot to genetically annihilate our black skin that didn't work. But no, it is far more likely that each case was based on individualistic desire. Such is the case today. So why do whites tend to imagine some conspiracy? In reality, I don't think they do. I think racists are afraid of losing a "culture war" that no one else is fighting; when people are simply naturally seeing the beauty of other races and not limiting their options to members of their own FABRICATED "racial" construct. Previous generations of black people often had too much history to do this but younger generations have an easier time. Racists can't stand this and yet there is no plot against them. It's simply nature. And so these racists are being driven by propaganda closer and closer to being Nazis. Nazism started out of fear too; fear of being replaced by Jews. But in some regards perhaps they couldn't intermix with the Jews the same way that whites and blacks can if the Jews in question are religious. Because if they are, and non Jewish whites aren't trying to convert, then there will continue to be a distinction.

But you know what? We don't actually need an extinction of any race, religion, or ethnic group. We simply need the majority to be non-discriminating. And there are black people who definitely discriminate too (even though they have better reasons). So we need a non-religious majority that has every race and religion in their immediate or close family. This will cure the world of most of its problems.

Messenger: The BANNED — Hemphill Sent: 7/3/2020 11:26:12 PM

Communist China providing automatic weapons to Antifa, Black Lives Matter… some stored in democrat-run government buildings including East End Complex Capitol building in Sacramento – Block 174

New intel that connects some recent dots on the emerging violence (and civil war attempt) from Black Lives Matter, the militant terrorism wing of the Democrat party.

China was caught attempting to smuggle “10,800 assault weapons parts” into Louisville, Kentucky. This news was announced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on June 26, 2020:

At the Express Consignment Operations hubs in Louisville U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers seized a shipment from China that contained over 10,000 Assault Weapons parts being smuggled into the country.

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 7/8/2020 5:30:03 PM

Wow... do you ever read?

"destined for a residence in Melbourne, Florida."

So someone told you that these parts (obviously china makes almost everything including american flags) were purchased by BLM and ANTIFA and you just believed them?

are you an idiot?

If this was a terrorist plot being foiled the leaders of these organizations would be in custody right now.


And the white population of that city is almost 79% with black being only 11%. If it was a black person that was going to take delivery the news would be all over it and their face would be all over every channel.

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 7/8/2020 9:23:25 PM

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 7/8/2020 9:31:40 PM

Messenger: MELCHEZIDEK Sent: 11/6/2020 3:50:48 AM

IPXninja, Trevor is a fool and is being used by the government to spread mis information. I would not listen to the man. That man is a fool who is a false pretender. You believe a false pretender and a mocker. It is dat mans job to mock and make fun of people. I don't like to watch thats mans show because he is just a puppet to get people believe in the order of babylon.

The Bible says, blessed is he who does not mock.

Trevor is a mocker for babylon media entertainment!

I and I don't like watching the news, but according to the news lately, the left has their own lies that they tell on their fake news media.

I thought I might add this to let the I and them know I thoughts and views on Trevor. I read the I like dat man. Dat man is a mocker InI!

and dat man don't represent anyone from Africa, the false pretender and mocker dat he is! dont believe dat man! he is a liar and his job is to mock!

Blessed I

More fire upon the Vatican

Fire burn the Pope in Rome

JAH Bless


1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 140141 - 150151 - 160161 - 170171 - 180181 - 190191 - 200
201 - 210211

Return to Reasoning List

Haile Selassie I