Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List

Here is a link to this page:

InfoWars? Or War on Information?

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 58
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/13/2019 12:29:48 PM

An independent man that is willing to admit that he gets things wrong on occasion vs an owned and controlled operation mocking bird mainstream media that lies constantly and rarely, if ever, admits they got a story wrong.. Yeah pretty clear there.

I find it really funny how you hang on one bit of a 4 hour conversation and use that 1 -- still out of context -- quote to discredit 20+ years of reporting. You're whole view is predicated on demonizing anything that challenges mainstream news. You use politifact and splc and adl, LOL!

Stay in your babylon bubble. It serves you well.

Messenger: SunofMan Sent: 10/13/2019 1:52:58 PM

You use the psychotic delusions of someone who capitalized on the murder of children.

How do you know when he's wrong, or do you just wait for the lawsuit?

Maybe he's not taking enough ChillForce....a real modern day snake oil salesman.

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/13/2019 2:31:37 PM

Capitalize? You truly are delusional. He never said they didnt die, he reported on suspected discrepancies and it has cost him dearly. How you spin that into capitalizing is beyond any sense of logic. But its really not surprising as you liberals have zero logic. In actuality, you liberals profit off of events like those because you use them to push your anti-gun agenda. The media you love begs for more of these shootings to report on endlessly for ratings to capitalize off of them.

You are litterly using Hillary Clintons playbook by focusing on this ONE 'issue' to discredit a man who is right about 90% of what he reports on. And this whole thread is hilarious because in your desperation from failing to prove me wrong, you attempt to discredit a source to justify dismissing anything I say as 'conspiracy theory'. Disingenuous and predictable

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/13/2019 5:44:08 PM

CNN and all other mainstream liberal 'news' outlets are waging the REAL war on information.

Dozens of hidden camera recordings.. Developing..

On the Eve of the CNN Insider blowing the whistle on his own network...

October 12, 2019

By James O’Keefe

“It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” – Samuel Adams.

This week, a CNN insider will blow the whistle and through Project Veritas will release dozens of recordings made of officials at the highest levels of CNN, revealing a political agenda, bias and misconduct hidden from public view.

This series of tapes — which we think will be the biggest story of the year for Project Veritas — blends two extraordinary series of events; a brave insider secretly recording at work and a hard-hitting piece of hidden camera muckraking into one of the supposed “most trusted names in news.”

A major aspect of this story is the heroic actions of an insider.

By far, the most often asked question (and most important) is “What can I do?” There is a new genre of answer—you can wear a hidden camera and blow the whistle on your employer through Project Veritas. This new movement, which we are calling “Be Brave. Do Something” is enabling citizens to become catalysts for reform. It is the modern incarnation of what Jack Anderson once described as “the sirens of Greek mythology, who, by their seductive singing, enticed unknowing wayfarers to abandon the cramped boredom of safe passage for a hazardous try at strange excitements and gratifications.”

If Project Veritas is the siren, the wayfarers this year have included two Google employees, a Facebook subcontractor and a Pinterest engineer who gave up their salaries and careers for the public’s right to know. We’ve had the privilege to entice these angels, knowing full well an army of grateful citizens are behind them. Project Veritas supporters have their backs no matter what as long as they stand up for what is true and important for the public to know.

“This was an act of atonement. An attempt to make my conscience clear,” said Zach Vorhies, who leaked us the “Algorithmic Unfairness’ document inside Google.

“Are we going to just let the biggest tech companies decide who wins every election from now on?” said Greg Coppola, who lost his job inside Google speaking out.

“I felt the public had a right to know,” said the Facebook insider who was fired for taking screenshots of them “Deboosting” videos for political reasons.

“For me there was no other option. I could go through the comforts of life, but what are we saving our ammo for,” said Eric Cochran, the Pinterest engineer, who was escorted out the building. “They can stop one man, but they can’t stop all of us.

And so it was destiny that the CNN wayfarer met me in the Spring by a happenstance, inspired by the actions of the others who came before him, I received a simple answer as to why: “I started at CNN with a dream to work in media, but my dream had become a nightmare,” With that, a hidden camera began to record…well…everything.

In our current media landscape, people are famous figures for notoriety. Celebrity is a big name. Hero is a big man. So there is a new breed of heroes – the sort that Daniel Boorstin spoke about in his book The Image: “In our world of big names, our true heroes tend to be anonymous. In this life of illusion and quasi-illusion, the person of solid virtues who can be admired for something more substantial than his well-knowness often proves to be the unsung hero: the teacher, the nurse, the mother, the honest cop, the hard worker at lonely, underpaid, unglamorous, unpublicized jobs.

“These anonymous heroes become part of the Veritas army.”

And then there is the act of investigating the media itself. Critics and political marketing industry operatives will rush to condemn this series of tapes with broad platitudes on how any efforts are “anti-journalist.” We’ve heard “The truth is more important than ever,” “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” and so forth. But behind the veneer of “holier than thou” sanctimonious attitudes are some ugly truths about the 4th estate.

But they are not new gathering. And our press isn’t truly free.

In fact, based upon what the people in these tapes say, it’s no longer even doing legitimate news gathering.

The media has become an industrial system of production that manufactures consent. This is true whether said by Noam Chomsky, James O’Keefe, or Glenn Greenwald. Political implications aside, the media has become an organ of propaganda that is only about commercialism, clicks, ratings, power and influence and political advocacy. All the while, the press evades scrutiny by appealing to rights afforded by the 1st amendment, while adhering to none the accompanying duties.

Big Tech and Big Media Corporations have more power than all three branches of government, but who holds them accountable? Who watches the watchmen? And why is it so important somebody holds them to account? Because doing their jobs is required in a Democracy.

The public’s right to know make all other rights in our society possible, because our government exists with the consent of the governed, and this consent must be informed. People will make their own decisions when they are properly informed.

Real journalism shouldn’t only be discourse, moral judgments, and conclusions. It shouldn’t have to engage in relentless speculation, punditry and stenography, opining to the masses. It should not abuse participation in advocacy work for anonymous leakers where sources in government get to set the agenda.

Investigative reporters (the real ones) have the duty to go beyond what somebody wants us to publish. What journalists ought to do is simply engage in the empirical method — to a degree so real — that the resulting truths transfix and anesthetize. When people are able to see what is happening, it becomes more real. We show that transgressions are in fact transgressions. The way to achieve proper reforms is to precisely capture reality.

On the Economic side, there is no question that much of corruption is due to economic pressures. Real truth finding often is a loss-leader in any business sense, and that’s why it is almost completely extinct from commercial news gathering. Being “the tip of the spear” often puts us in an exposed position where the results of our work reverberates into embarrassment, resignations, deeply penetrates the fabric of people’s lives and violates social boundaries. That means litigation, retaliation and economic pressures. “Many of the large media companies are fully integrated into the market, and for the others, too. The pressures of stockholders, directors, and bankers to focus on the bottom line are powerful.”

The first step towards reforming the system is accurately reporting reality that shakes people awake with moral indignation. But in the digital era, with streaming visuals, hard to refute, we’re able to cut through propaganda like a hot knife through butter, trusting the power of free people to make the best policy decisions if they are equipped with the truth. We break down the barrier between the realms of how public officials behave in public and private, and therefore tackle the great lie.

It seems like most of the people who are supposed to govern are busy staring into a TV camera. “One correspondent with one cameraman [can] become as important as twenty senators,” as David Halberstam once wrote. They are protected from any public scrutiny. They demonstrate Sanctimonious, holier-than-thou smugness. Journalists are no longer about public service, and in private, they will change the subject if you talk about democracy dying in darkness. It’s really about commercialism, clicks, ratings, power and influence.

It’s not just politicians who kowtow to the cable news order and to the power it yields, it’s the wealthiest man in the world saying that his most proud accomplishment was purchasing his woke, clickbait farm.

Jeff Bezos wrote on the Medium: “Even though The Post is a complexifier for me, I do not at all regret my investment. The Post is a critical institution with a critical mission. My stewardship of The Post and my support of its mission, which will remain unswerving, is something I will be most proud of.”

This man who has built the most powerful company on earth is most proud of the fact he bought a newspaper which isn’t going to earn him any money.

But make no mistake: for Bezos, this isn’t about informing the masses, it’s about power and influence.

So, in a country governed by public opinion, and where public opinion is largely governed by the press, isn’t it critical to understand what governs the press?

And this is why Project Veritas will be exposing CNN this week.

Messenger: The Nomad Sent: 10/13/2019 8:25:31 PM

"An independent man that is willing to admit that he gets things wrong on occasion"

You're about as Independent as the flu virus and just as welcome.

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/14/2019 12:11:04 PM

The REAL war on information.

CNN insider exposes media anti-trump hoax and liberal bias.

Part 1

Messenger: IPXninja Sent: 10/14/2019 3:46:08 PM

VIDEO of Alex Jones talking about Sandy Hook and how he was wrong about it. This video is all that's needed to debunk Alex Jones.

The video shows his claim back on Dec 29, 2014 to be exact.
The video shows another incident on Sep 25, 2014

In this video Alex Jones even tells you why people believe conspiracy theories like his.

"the trauma of the media and the corporations lying so much then everything begins-you don't trust anything anymore. Kinda like a child whose parents lie to them over and over again well pretty soon they don't know what reality is.

Alex Jones understands what he's doing even if you don't. He's able to feed his listeners a false reality because they don't know who to trust and they don't trust authority. All he then has to do is make himself the anti-establishment "authority" on truth and then people just assume that everything he says is the the literal truth even though he's doing zero journalism to back it all up.

"I myself have had almost like a form of psychosis back in the past where I basically thought everything was staged although now I'm learning a lot of time things aren't staged."

This is the real Alex Jones. When he's on his show he's 100% confident because confidence sells the product. However, after he's caught red handed he admits to have been wrong but dances around the notion of whether he's LEGALLY responsible because his defense is that he didn't mean to deceive anyone. This is simply a legal defense that no one should fall for. Of course he knew what he was doing the whole time. He simply doesn't want to be responsible for the consequences for real life Americans and people who have suffered tragic injury and loss. And so he makes it seem like he's dumb and is the victim of some kind of mental health issues. Why? Because in criminal law you need to prove INTENT. At best the prosecution can prove he intended to deceive his audience. At worse he can be shown to be prone to make false claims with huge implications, having backed them up without any real evidence.

"he seemed very credible and put together earlier on" Jones said of Wolfgang, who his interviewer described as a raving lunatic. Jones doesn't disagree with the interviewer who is judging by the email correspondences between them. Instead he talks about how credible he "SEEMED" earlier on.

But where does he get the evidence to say "photos of kids who died who are still alive"? You either have this kind of evidence or you don't. He even said Anderson Cooper was in on it because he faked reporting from the scene. Although Jones is not a graphic artist, serious photographer, or any kind of image analyst he claims you could see the blue screen in Cooper's eyes. But it is the way that he says these things that gets people to believe him. Saying its "obvious", for example... primes people who wouldn't know either way, to believe him without seeing evidence of their own. And all he has to do is use so-called evidence that is difficult to say one way or the other. But this is his modus operandi. He profits on conspiracy theories so every one of these lies he tells becomes part of his BRAND. They becomes products of that brand and as people consume them (especially since they are dramatic and inflammatory) he knows he's going to get more and more views on his social media as well as social sharing. As long as whoever he's lying about doesn't sue him his credibility only grows from telling more and more lies. And if his audience doesn't bother to get any information that is unsanctioned by Infowars they'll never see him for the fraud that he is.

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/14/2019 6:26:49 PM




Man, you really have a hard on for Mr. Jones eh? In your fantasy world, he is this mastermind of manipulation and deception, molding minds like lucifer himself! -- all the while using CNN to 'show' it! LOL -- Meanwhile, CNN is being exposed for running biased propaganda to manipulate elections and millions of Americans. Wow. What it must be like in your upside down world...

Something other than Sandy hook please Hillary. Thats literally all you 'have'

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/15/2019 1:06:19 PM

More in the war on information... From the mainstream sources you worship.


For “atrocities” as a result of him pulling out U.S. troops.

ABC Attempts to Pass Off Gun Range Footage as Combat Footage From Syria to Blame Trump

ABC News attempted to pass off footage from a 2017 gun range show as evidence of Turkey bombing Kurdish civilians in order to blame President Trump.

Yes, really.

The ABC News anchor presenting the footage comments that it shows “the situation rapidly spiraling out of control in northern Syria” after Trump ordered U.S. forces to leave.

The anchor accuses Trump of “effectively abandoning America’s allies in the fight against ISIS,” before discussing the video.

“This video right here appearing to show Turkey’s military bombing Kurd civilians in a Syrian border town,” he states before mentioning “horrific reports of atrocities committed by Turkish-backed fighters.”

The chyron accompanying the footage reads “SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA.”

However, the video (original posted here and below) is from a 2017 gun range show entitled ‘Knob Creek night shoot 2017’.

The footage clearly shows an audience watching the show and is obviously not combat footage from Syria.

ABC News responded by making their original erroneous report featuring the footage private on YouTube.

ABC News report:

They literally passed off an old video of a gun range show as combat footage to blame Trump for “atrocities.”

Will anyone face any consequences for this disgraceful example of fake news?

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill Sent: 10/15/2019 1:26:09 PM

You ignore the MSM admitting it has an anti-conservative, bias agenda -- while talking about 'journalistic integrity' -- and ignore the MSM creating BLATANTLY FAKE NEWS to perpetuate an endless war... You even take it a step further by using this SAME lying media to attack the independent radio host Alex Jones who stands up to the babylon media. LOL. Talk about serving the beast system! What a way... What a way

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 58

Return to Reasoning List

Haile Selassie I