JAH - President Trump and MAGA

In the video description that you posted it says that "most" the video footage is from 2018. So its a collection of videos over an unknown amount of time, it is 25 minutes of footage over the course who knows how long. It trys to suggest that it is filmed at one time, but it is not.

The video was posted by Tucker Carlson, thats who started the youtube channel if you look at the channels "about" page. Tucker Carlson works for the right-wing conservative media at Fox News. It can not really be trusted, well it can be trusted as much as one can trust a video from CNN.

I can't read your other link at the moment, only the summary, not its agenda in the USA. I'll check it when I get back to a computer.

Messenger: Jahcub Onelove

Sent: 11/28/2018 7:51:46 PM

The video is nowhere in the realm of "empirical evidence". It is from a known biased media outlet. You should hold yourself to the same standard as you hold others to, especially as you have criticised most, if not all, the links other post as "liberal propaganda". Look how you go and post "conservative propaganda".

Either you are ignorant of your hypocricy, or you just come here trying to fool rasta. Rastafari no fool.

"Keep cool babylon you don't know what you're doing
Keep cool babylon you don't know what you're saying"

Messenger: Nesta1

Sent: 11/28/2018 11:28:11 PM

Once again, it's important to point out that someone who comes into a sanctuary simply to badger and harass the worshippers is not exercising freedom of speech, he is abusing it and is impinging upon the freedom of others to enjoy fellowship & civil discourse within the sanctuary. People would not object to his presence if he came just to discuss a different point of view, but that's not the case when he comes to hurl insults, call people names, and tell lies. When he persists after being asked repeatedly to conduct himself in a civilized manner then it is perfectly reasonable for the owner of the sanctuary to show him the door.

Jahlove Onecub,
i liked your take on who really is entitled to occupy the land in North America. If people check out the roots of the Mexican�American War they'll find that the purpose was to steal a huge part of Mexican territory from Mexico (i.e., an area about the size of present day Mexico) and add it to the United States of America. Not surprisingly we're not hearing any condemnation of that by those who claim to cherish national sovereignty but really just use that claim as a mask for pure racism.

Messenger: Nesta1

Sent: 11/29/2018 12:13:35 AM

While I&i do not "defend" the sins of my brethren or sistren, I&i will never never back away from or be made to feel ashamed of following His Majesty's exhortation that we LOVE ONE ANOTHER - which includes all of those who commit the most odious sins imaginable. Only through Love can redemption occur.

Truth: Those those delight in the condemnation of their sinning brethren & sistren secretly DELIGHT in their sins, for this is the source of their foolish pride & feelings of superiority.

-If i can Love the brother who sold his soul to the devil to volunteer to become a U.S. soldier and then murdered whole Iraqi families after participating in gang rapes of their daughters (yes, i actually know this person & have heard his confession)...

-If i can Love the former El Salvadoran army colonel who was trained by the U.S. Army School of the Americas (SOA) and deployed by the CIA to rape and murder the children of interrogation subjects in front of them (yes, i actually know this person and have heard his confession also)...

then i can certainly Love others who have committed similar or lesser crimes. After all, why does it make sense to pin medals of honor on some criminals who have been brainwashed by the Babylon System into committing unconscionable acts while excoriating others?

We are all sinners, and only the sinner whose sins include foolish pride & hypocrisy tries to place himself in the position of JAH and sit in judgment of other sinners.

Matthew 5:
[43] Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
[44] But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
[45] That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
[46] For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? DO NOT EVEN THE PUBLICANS THE SAME?
[47] And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? DO NOT EVEN THE PUBLICANS SO?

We distinguish ourselves as RastafarI by our extraordinary ability to exhibit forgiveness, compassion and Love. His Majesty commands us to spread His Teachings by our own example.

Messenger: Jahcub Onelove

Sent: 11/29/2018 5:04:40 AM

Hemphill,

I checked your other link, no where does it say that the UN plans to "replace American population with 600 million South American Migrants" far from it, and so very far from the truth. You criticize ones for not reading your links and yet neither do you read your own links! And by not reading your own links you end up giving false witness, telling lies.

This is what it actually says:

United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration 77
8. United States of America

(a) Past trends
The total fertility rate in the United States dropped from 3.45 births per woman in 1950-1955 to 2.02 in 1970-1975. Except for a temporary period during the late 1970s and early 1980s, when it hovered around 1.8, the total fertility rate has continued to be around two children per woman. Life expectancy at birth, meanwhile, has risen from 69.0 years in 1950-1955 to 75.7 years in 1990-1995. As a consequence of these changes, the proportion of the population aged 65 or older rose from 8.3 per cent in 1950 to 12.5 per cent in 1995, and the potential support ratio declined from 7.8 in 1950 to 5.2 in 1995. As a point of comparison, the potential support ratio was 15 in 1900, when 4 per cent of the population was aged 65 years or older.

(b) Scenario I
Scenario I, the medium variant of the United Nations 1998 Revision, assumes an annual net intake of 760,000 migrants per year between 1995-2050, for a total of 41,800,000 net migrants during the period. Accordingly, the total population of the United States is projected to increase continuously from 267 million in 1995 to 349 million in 2050 (the results of the 1998 United Nations projections are shown in the annex tables). By 2050, out of this total population of 349 million, 59 million, or 16.8 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. The population aged 15-64 would increase slowly from 174 million in 1995 to 214 million in 2050, although not in a monotonic fashion. The population aged 65 or older would rise rapidly, from 33 million in 1995 to nearly 76 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decrease from 5.2 in 1995 to 2.8 in 2050.

(c) Scenario II
Scenario II, which is the medium variant with zero migration, uses the fertility and mortality assumptions of the medium variant of the 1998 Revision, but without any migration to the United States after 1995. The results in this scenario are quite different from those of scenario I. The total population would increase to 290 million in 2050, which is 50 million less than in scenario I. The population aged 15-64 would rise from 174 million in 1995 to 192 million in 2010 and 2015 and then decline, returning to 174 million in 2050. The population aged 65 or older would double, from 33 million in 1950 to 68 million in 2050. As a result, the potential support ratio would decline to 2.6 in 2050, which is slightly below that presented in scenario I.

(d) Scenario III
Scenario III keeps the size of the total United States population constant at its maximum of 298 million, which it would reach in 2030 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the total population constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 6.4 million migrants between 2030 and 2050, which is an average of 319,000 migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 298 million, 7.3 million, or 2.5 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.

(e) Scenario IV
Scenario IV keeps the size of the population aged 15 to 64 constant at its maximum of 192.5 million, which it would reach in 2015 (assuming no in-migration after 1995). In order to keep the working-age population constant at that level, 18.0 million migrants would be needed between 2015 and 2050, which is an average of 513 thousand migrants per year. By 2050, out of a total population of 316 million, 25.0 million, or 7.9 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. 78 United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration

(f) Scenario V
Scenario V does not allow the potential support ratio to decrease below the value of 3.0. In order to achieve this, no immigrants would be needed until 2025, and 44.9 million immigrants would be needed between 2025 and 2035, an average of 4.5 million per year during that period. By 2050, out of a total population of 352 million, 61 million, or 17 per cent, would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants.

(g) Scenario VI
Scenario VI keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 value of 5.2 persons aged 15-64 for each person aged 65 or older. In order to keep the potential support ratio constant at that level, it would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year. By 2050, out of a United States total population of 1.1 billion, 775 million, or 73 per cent, would be post1995 immigrants or their descendants.

(h) Additional considerations
The official United States estimate of (documented) migrants into the United States from 1990 to 1996 is about 1.1 million per year. Thus, the past regular inflow into the United States is well above the number of migrants needed to prevent a decline in the total population or in the working-age population. Also under both scenarios III and IV, the percentage of post-1995 immigrants and their descendants in the total population of 2050 (2.5 per cent for scenario III and 7.9 per cent for scenario IV) would be below the percentage of foreign-born that exists currently (9.6 per cent). Figure 23 shows, for scenarios I, II, III and IV, the population of the United States in 2050, indicating the share that consists of post-1995 migrants and their descendants.

In the absence of migration, the figures show that it would be necessary to raise the upper limit of the working-age to 66.9 years to obtain a potential support ratio of 3.0 in 2050, and to about 74 years in order to obtain in 2050 the same potential support ratio observed in 1995 in the United States, which was 5.2
persons of working age per each older person past working age. Increasing the activity rates of the population, if it were possible, would only be a partial palliative to the decline in the support ratio due to ageing. If the activity rates of all men and women aged 25 to 64 were to increase to 100 per cent by 2050,
this would make up for only 21 per cent of the loss in the active support ratio resulting from the ageing of the population.

Messenger: Nesta1

Sent: 11/29/2018 5:34:40 AM

Jahcub - Watch this short video of history. You'll enjoy it. Everything that Abby Martin says here is confirmed by numerous (even mainstream) historical sources.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_G3tk1hj-eo

Messenger: Jahcub Onelove

Sent: 11/29/2018 5:44:55 AM

United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration 15
III. THE APPROACH: METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS

A. THE SIX SCENARIOS
As part of its regular work programme, the Population Division prepares population estimates andprojections biennially for all countries of the world, with estimates for the period from 1950 to 1995, and with four projection variants for the period 1995 to 2050. The last such revision can be found in World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision (United Nations, 1999a, 1999b and 1999c).

The four projection variants in the 1998 Revision (high, medium, low and constant) are prepared for countries and areas using the cohort-component method. The different variants are based on different assumptions about the future course of fertility. All variants incorporate the same assumptions about the future course of mortality, and for most countries the assumptions about future international migration trends are also the same for all four variants.

The high, medium and low variants constitute the core of the official estimates and projections of the United Nations. They are meant to create a range that encompasses the likely future path of population growth for each country and area of the world. The high and low variants provide upper and lower bounds for that growth. The medium variant is a useful central reference for trends over the longer-term future. The constant variant projects the population of each country by maintaining fertility constant at
the level estimated for 1990-1995. The results of this variant are meant to be used for illustrative purposes and are not considered to represent a likely future path for any country or area.

Building upon the medium variant of the 1998 Revision, the present replacement migration study considers six different scenarios with regard to the migration streams needed to achieve particular population objectives or outcomes. The six scenarios are described below:

Scenario I. This scenario is based on the medium variant of the 1998 Revision.

Scenario II. This scenario is based on the medium variant of the 1998 Revision, amended by assuming zero migration after 1995.

Scenario III. This scenario computes and assumes the migration required to maintain the size of the total population at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995.

Scenario IV. This scenario computes and assumes the migration required to maintain the size of the working-age population (15 to 64 years) at the highest level it would reach in the absence
of migration after 1995.

Scenario V. This scenario computes and assumes the migration required to prevent the ratio of the size of the population aged 15-64 to the size of the population aged 65 or over, called the
potential support ratio (PSR), from declining below the value of 3.0.

Scenario VI. This scenario computes and assumes the migration required to maintain the potential support ratio (PSR) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after
1995.

16 United Nations Population Division, Replacement Migration

The study examines the situation for eight countries: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. In addition, from 1995 on computations are also made for Europe and for the European Union, treating each as if it was a single country. The time period covered is roughly a half a century, from 1995 to 2050.

All the data pertaining to the eight countries and two regions mentioned above for the period 1950 to 1995 come from the estimates in the 1998 Revision. For the period 1995 to 2050, projections are carried out using the cohort-component method, taking as a base the 1995 population by sex and five-year age
groups and applying the age-specific fertility and mortality rates assumed in the medium variant of the
1998 Revision.

More specifically, the number of survivors in each age and sex category at the end of each five-year period is calculated by applying to the base-year population age- and sex-specific survival rates that are derived from an observed or estimated national life-table, using the United Nations model for future
mortality improvement. The number of births expected to take place during each five-year period is derived by applying the estimated age-specific fertility rate, which is obtained from the national fertility pattern and assumed future fertility trend, to the average number of women in the age group. The births are distributed by sex on the basis of the estimated sex ratio at birth. The assumed net number of international migrants, classified by age and sex, is incorporated into the calculations.

The detailed past results and future assumptions of the 1998 Revision for each of the countries and regions examined in this study are presented in the annex tables. A detailed description of the methodology used for the estimates and projections may be found in World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision, volume III (United Nations, 1999c).

Messenger: Nesta1

Sent: 11/29/2018 6:01:18 AM

Jahcub,

You've been doing your homework in a serious way. These well-performed demographic analyses by the UN bode ominously for the U.S. unless it looks to bolster it working age cohort through immigration.

As a sixty-something myself, i can assure you that age discrimination in employment in America is alive and flourishing, and you don't want to be a fifty-something, sixty-something or, heaven forbid, a seventy-something out there looking for employment that will sustain a middle class (or even a upper lower class) lifestyle.

This ageing population bomb is precisely the demographic conundrum that China is facing right now as a result of implementing its one-child policy for so long. Developed countries characteristically demonstrate a drop in birth rates (as increased personal wealth and material gains tend to foster an attitude of children being a financial burden rather than a blessing). Those harboring anti-immigration ideologies out of racist views or simple selfishness don't realize that if they were successful in their shortsighted aims they would be cutting off their noses to spite their faces.

WE SHOULD WELCOME OUR FOREIGN-BORN BRETHREN & SISTREN WITH OPEN ARMS AND HAPPILY SHARE OUR PROSPERITY WITH THEM AS DOING SO IS THE ONLY WAY TO ENSURE OUR OWN FUTURE PROSPERITY

Messenger: The BANNED -- Hemphill

Sent: 11/29/2018 8:40:09 AM

The direct link to the page of the 2001 proposal from the U.N says its unavailable. 'Web page not found'.. Thats interesting to me.. I had linked the correct page earlier within this thread but now that post is 'hidden' on the count of me being banned. Anyway, very clear that the plan is to replace the American population over the next 50 years.

�It would be necessary to have 593 million immigrants from 1995 to 2050, an average of 10.8 million per year.�

And that video is shot from a farmer's ranch on a game trail.. There are 100's of these types of videos. Are you suggesting its fake? Even fake news FOX and CNN use real videos.. A broken clock is right twice a day.. Tucker Carlson is extermely on point even tho he is with Fox.. The southern border averages 1200 illegal crossings every single day.. 1 is too many.. The money spent on dealing with this issue in one year is far greater than building a beautiful wall and not having to worry about it -- as much..

Here they are coming across in military outfits and armed to the teeth.

Messenger: Nesta1

Sent: 11/29/2018 9:03:07 AM