Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List
 

Here is a link to this page:
http://www.jah-rastafari.com/forum/message-view.asp?message_group=5789&start_row=31


Out of Africa Theory Debunked???

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 49
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 2:55:24 PM
Reply

Who left Africa first?
Homo ergaster may have been the first human species to leave Africa and fossil remains show this species had expanded its range into southern Eurasia by 1.75 million years ago. Their descendents, Homo erectus, then spread eastward and were established in South East Asia by at least 1.6 million years ago.

However, an alternate theory proposes that hominins migrated out of Africa before Homo ergaster evolved, possibly about 2 million years ago, prior to the earliest dates of Homo erectus in Asia. These hominins may have been either australopithicines or, more likely, an unknown species of Homo, similar in appearance to Homo habilis. In this theory, the population found at Dmanisi represent a missing link in the evolution of Homo erectus/Homo ergaster. Perhaps too, the evolution of African Homo ergaster occurred outside of Africa and considerable gene flow occurred between African and Eurasian populations.

This theory has gained more support in recent years due to DNA research. Evidence from a genetic study indicates an expansion out of Africa about 1.9 million years ago and gene flow occurring between Asian and African populations by 1.5 million years ago. More physical evidence is needed from key areas in Eurasia such as Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, but politics is currently making this difficult.

What made it possible to leave Africa?
Homo ergaster was the first of our ancestors to possess the physical and cultural attributes needed in order to disperse though the arid environments of northern Africa and the Middle East. These attributes included:

a modern body shape with an efficient striding gait suited to travelling over long distances, although smaller statures are represented in the remains from Dmanisi
a sufficiently developed intelligence to cope with unfamiliar environments, although did not require a brain size much bigger than Homo habilis, with an average brain size of 610cc
improved technology to aid subsistence (Oldowan-style tools or Mode1 Technology have been found at sites in Dmanisi, Georgia, and northern China, both dating to 1.7 million years old)
a diet that included more meat and which increased the food supply options in seasonally arid environments
Who left Africa next?
After the first early dispersals out of Africa, various other groups of early humans spread out of Africa as their populations grew. These dispersals were not regular or constant but instead occurred as waves of dispersal during periods with favourable climatic and environmental conditions.

These waves of dispersal out of Africa included movements eastward across southern Asia more than one million years ago and movements into western Europe within the last 900,000 years. Movements back into Africa also occurred.

More recently, modern humans began their dispersal out of Africa. Most experts conclude, from genetic and material evidence, that this occurred on a mass scale only within the last 60,000 years or so. The exception is in the Levant, where modern humans occupied the region about 120,000-100,000 years ago but did not seem to expand further than this. However, new evidence in the form of stone tools may cause a rethink of this scenario. Stone tools have been found in India dating to about 74,000 years old, in Yemen dating to between 70,000 and 80,000 years old, and in the United Arab Emirates dating to about 80,000 years old. Some of these tools resemble African Middle Stone Age technology, others are more like those used by Neanderthals in Europe and Homo sapiens and Neanderthals in the Levant. No human remains were found with the tools, but as Neanderthals have not been found in these regions, it is assumed the makers were modern humans.

By 100,000 years ago, humans had dispersed and diversified into at least three species. Our own species, Homo sapiens, lived in Africa and the Middle East, Homo neanderthalensis lived in Europe, and Homo floresiensis in southern Asia. DNA from human remains in Denisova cave, Russia, suggest a probable fourth species was also still extant when Homo sapiens was migrating through southern Asia about 60,000 years ago. Modern Melanesians have about 4% of this DNA. The species is unknown, but may be late surviving Homo heidelbergensis or a yet-to-be-discovered species. This diversity disappeared about 28,000 years ago, however, and only one human species now survives.

- See more at: http://australianmuseum.net.au/The-first-migrations-out-of-Africa#sthash.oPjV8Zkd.dpuf


NEANDERTHAL



HEIDELBERGENSIS



Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 2:56:22 PM
Reply


When and where did our species originate?

When and where modern humans arose is still debated.






Our species, Homo sapiens, has now spread to all parts of the world, but our origins are debated.There are several viewpoints on this but the two major and opposing opinions are the ‘Out of Africa’ model and the ‘Multiregional’ model.

Out of Africa model
The ‘Out of Africa’ model is currently the most widely favoured explanation accounting for the origins of modern humans. It suggests that modern humans originated in Africa within the last 200,000 years from a single group of ancestors. Modern humans continued to evolve in Africa and had spread to the Middle East by 100,000 years ago and possibly as early as 160,000 years ago. Modern humans only became well established elsewhere in the last 50,000 years. The ‘Out of Africa’ model has had a variety of names including:

‘The Garden of Eden’ hypothesis
‘Noah’s Ark’ hypothesis
‘Out of Africa 2’ hypothesis, which distinguishes the earlier and later dispersals of humans out of Africa. In this case, ‘Out of Africa 1’ refers to the initial dispersal out of Africa by Homo ergaster, whereas ‘Out of Africa 2’ refers to the later dispersal out of Africa by modern humans.
Did modern humans interbreed with other human species?
As modern humans spread, they replaced all other human species. Homo heidelbergensis was replaced by modern humans Africa and Europe, Homo erectus was replaced in Asia and Homo neanderthalensis was replaced in Europe.

The most extreme version of this model suggests that modern humans replaced the older humans without any interbreeding. Less extreme versions allow for some interbreeding between these populations but suggest that gene flow and mixing between these different species was extremely limited.

Groundbreaking analysis of the Neanderthal genome (nuclear DNA and genes) published in 2010 supports the less extreme 'Out of Africa' model. Results show that modern humans and Neanderthals did interbreed, although on a very limited scale. Researchers compared the genomes of five modern humans with the Neanderthal, discovering that Europeans and Asians share about 1-4% of their DNA with Neanderthals and Africans none. This suggests that modern humans bred with Neanderthals after moderns left Africa but before they spread to Asia and Europe. The most likely location is the Levant, where both species co-existed for thousands of years at various times between 50-90,000 years ago. Interestingly, the data doesn't support wide-scale interbreeding between the species in Europe, where it would have been most likely given their close proximity. Researchers are now questioning why interbreeding occurred on such a low scale, given that it was biologically possible. The answer may lie in cultural differences.

Another probable example of interbreeding between modern humans and other human species was also published in 2010. DNA from a tooth and finger bone excavated from Denisova cave in Russia, showed these remains belonged to a genetically distinct group of humans distantly related to Neanderthals and even more distantly related to Homo sapiens. The study also revealed that these 'Denisovans' interbred with the ancestors of modern Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians as the DNA of both groups today contains 4% to 6% Denisovan DNA (it has not been found in other Eurasian groups sampled). This may be due to rare encounters between modern humans and Denisovans as moderns migrated through South-East Asia and on to Melanesia. What species the Denisovans belonged to is unknown, but it is suggested they may be Homo heidelbergensis, whose remains have been found in the correct timespans and locations but whose DNA has yet to be extracted (and may never be due to the age of the remains).

Evolving different physical features
The different physical features now found in modern humans from different geographical areas around the world are believed to have evolved over only the last 60,000 years or so as a result of adaptations to different environments.

Evidence supporting the Out of Africa model
the oldest known fossils of Homo sapiens are African
fossil evidence indicates that modern humans quickly replaced earlier humans in Europe and western Asia.
all living people show little genetic diversity. This is interpreted as being the result of a relatively recent replacement of earlier, more diverse populations.
a variety of different DNA studies on modern humans all suggest a recent common ancestry from a small gene pool. Most of these point to Africa as the origin of this population
DNA from contemporary humans can be used to produce maps of human movement throughout the world and show how long an indigenous population has lived in an area. These indicate modern human origins in Africa.
analysis of the Neanderthal genome and comparisons with modern humans does support the view that the vast majority of genes of non-Africans came with the spread of modern humans that originated in Africa and then spread throughout the world.
Multiregional model
The ‘Multiregional’ model suggests that when human ancestors first left Africa nearly two million years ago, they spread out and formed regional groups of early humans across Africa, Asia and Europe. Modern humans then evolved concurrently in all these regions rather than from a single group of humans in Africa. The ‘Multiregional’ model is also known as the ‘Regional Continuity’ model.

Did interbreeding occur?
Interbreeding between different regional populations did occur. Geographically separated populations remained genetically similar to one another through the genetic mixing that resulted from interbreeding and a single species was therefore maintained.

Although it is now known that interbreeding did occur between Neanderthals and some early modern humans, this is not on the scale that proponents of the Multiregional model claim. The amount of Neanderthal DNA found in some modern humans is too small to have made any significant difference.

The variety of modern humans
The different physical features that are found in modern humans from different geographical areas around the world are believed to have evolved over a very long period in Africa, Asia and Europe since the time when each region became settled.

Evidence supporting the Multiregional model
there are similarities between some skull features found in modern humans and in ancient humans from the same regions.
some modern Asians have features similar to those of some ancient humans from China (in the Out of Africa model these ancient humans are known as Chinese Homo erectus).
some modern Australian Aboriginal people show similarities to some ancient humans from Indonesia (in the Out of Africa model these ancient humans are known as Indonesian Homo erectus)
some modern Europeans show similarities to ancient humans from Europe (in the Out of Africa model these ancient humans are known as the Neanderthals, or Homo neanderthalensis).
all living people show little genetic diversity. This is interpreted as being the result of continuous mixing of genes among regional populations.
- See more at: http://australianmuseum.net.au/When-and-where-did-our-species-originate#sthash.wKrIlBzb.dpuf


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 3:01:02 PM
Reply

HOMOSAPIEN SAPIEN (MODERN HOMO SAPIEN)





We evolved only relatively recently but with complex culture and technology have been able to spread throughout the world and occupy a range of different environments. This resulted in a species that is highly variable in physical appearance, despite the fact that we are almost genetically identical to each other.

Background

Age
300,000 years ago to present:

archaic Homo sapiens from 300,000 years ago
modern Homo sapiens from about 160,000 years ago
What the name means
The name we selected for ourselves means ‘wise human’. Homo is the Latin word for ‘human’ or ‘man’ and sapiens is derived from a Latin word that means ‘wise’ or ‘astute’.

Other names
Various names have been used for our species including:

‘Cro-Magnon Man’ is commonly used for the modern humans that inhabited Europe from about 40,000 to 10,000 years ago.
The term ‘archaic’ Homo sapiens has sometimes been used for African fossils dated between 300,000 and 150,000 years of age that are difficult to classify due to a mixture of modern and archaic features. Some scientists prefer to place these fossils in a separate species, Homo helmei.
Homo sapiens sapiens is the name given to our species if we are considered a sub-species of a larger group. This name is used by those that describe the specimen from Herto, Ethiopia as Homo sapiens idàltu or by those who believed that modern humans and the Neanderthals were members of the same species. (The Neanderthals were called Homo sapiens neanderthalensis in this scheme).
Major fossil sites of early Homo sapiens
Fossils of the earliest members of our species, archaic Homo sapiens, have all been found in Africa. Fossils of modern Homo sapiens have been found in Africa and in many other sites across much of the world. Sites older than 150k include Florisbad, Omo-Kibish, Ngaloba and Herto. Sites dating to about 100k include Klasies River Mouth, Border Cave, Skhul and Qafzeh. Sites younger than 40k include Dolni Vestonice, Cro-Magnon, Aurignac and Lake Mungo.

Relationships with other species
Homo sapiens evolved in Africa from Homo heidelbergensis. They co-existed for a long time in Europe and the Middle East with the Neanderthals, and possibly with Homo erectus in Asia and Homo floresiensis in Indonesia, but are now the only surviving human species.

For information on modern humans interbreeding with other human species see australianmuseum.net.au/When-and-where-did-our-species-originate.

The transition to modern humans
African fossils provide the best evidence for the evolutionary transition from Homo heidelbergensis to archaic Homo sapiens and then to early modern Homo sapiens. There is, however, some difficulty in placing many of the transitional specimens into a particular species because they have a mixture of intermediate features which are especially apparent in the sizes and shapes of the forehead, brow ridge and face. Some suggest the name Homo helmei for these intermediate specimens that represent populations on the brink of becoming modern. Late surviving populations of archaic Homo sapiens and Homo heidelbergensis lived alongside early modern Homo sapiens before disappearing from the fossil record by about 100,000 years ago. Key specimens that reveal an evolutionary transition from archaic to modern Homo sapiens include Florisbad cranium, LH18 from Laetoli, Omo 1 and 2 from Omo-Kibish, Herto skull from Ethiopia and Skhul 5 from Israel.

Important specimens: Late early modern Homo sapiens

Liujiang – a skull discovered in 1958 in Guanxi province, South China. Age is uncertain, but at least 15,000 years old. This skull lacks the typically northern Asian features found in modern populations from those regions, lending support to popular theories that such features only arose in the last 8000 years.
Aurignac – skull discovered in Aurignac, France. The first Aurignac fossils were accidentally found in 1852. A workman digging a trench in a hillside found a cave that had been blocked by rock but after clearing away the debris he found 17 skeletons. The skeletons were taken to a local cemetery for burial but later investigations indicated that the skeletons were actually up to 10,000 years old.
Cro-Magnon 1 – a 32,000-year-old skull discovered in 1868 in Cro-Magnon rockshelter, Les Eyzies, France. This adult male represents the oldest known skull of a modern human from western Europe. Cro-Magnon skeletons have proportions similar to those of modern Africans rather than modern Europeans. This suggests that the Cro-Magnons had migrated from a warmer climate and had a relatively recent African ancestry.
Important specimens: Early modern Homo sapiens

Herto – a 160,000-year-old partial skull discovered in1997 in Herto, Ethiopia. This skull from an adult male and those of another adult and a child were found in 1997 and publicly announced in 2003. They are some of the oldest fossils of modern Homo sapiens yet discovered. Some scientists regard these fossils as a sub-species of modern humans (named Homo sapiens idàltu) because of some slight differences in their skull features. They show a suite of modern human traits, mixed with archaic and early modern features. Also of significance are cut marks on the child's skull. These were made when the bone was still fresh in a manner indicating ritual practice. The skull also appeared 'polished' from repeated handling before it was laid in the ground.
Omo 1 – a partial skull discovered in1967 in Omo-Kibish, Ethiopia. A recently published date for this skull was about 195,000 years old, but this is disputed. However, it is still one of the oldest known fossils of early modern Homo sapiens. Features which show the transition from an archaic to an early modern Homo sapiens include a more rounded and expanded braincase and a high forehead. Now dated to the same age as Omo 2, it does raise interesting questions about why it appears to have slightly more advanced features than Omo 2. Were they from the same population?
Skhul 5 – a 90,000-year-old skull discovered in1932 in Skhul Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel. This skull of an adult male has developed relatively modern features including a higher forehead although it still retains some archaic features including a brow ridge and slightly projecting face. This specimen and others from the Middle East are the oldest known traces of modern humans outside of Africa. They prove that Homo sapiens had started to spread out of Africa by 100,000 years ago, although it may be that these remains represent a population that did not expand beyond this region – with migrations to the rest of the world occurring later, about 60-70,000 years ago.
Important specimens: Archaic Homo sapiens

LH 18 – skull discovered in 1976 in Ngaloba, Laetoli, Tanzania. Age is about 120,000 years old (but debated). This skull is transitional between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. It has a number of primitive features but also has some modern characteristics such as a reduced brow ridge and smaller facial features. The late date of this specimen indicates that archaic humans lived alongside modern populations for some time.
Florisbad – a 260,000-year-old partial cranium discovered in 1932 in Florisbad, South Africa. This skull shows features intermediate between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. The face is broad and massive but still relatively flat and the forehead is approaching the modern form.
Omo 2 – a 195,000-year-old braincase discovered in 1967 in Omo-Kibish, Ethiopia. Like LH 18, this braincase shows a blend of primitive and modern features that places it as a member of a population transitional between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. Its primitive features include a heavier, more robust construction; an angled rather than rounded rear section; and a lower, sloping forehead. Refer to Omo 1 specimen for interesting comparisons.
Key physical features
Homo sapiens skulls have a distinctive shape that differentiates them from earlier human species. Their body shape tends to vary, however, due to adaptation to a wide range of environments.

Body size and shape

the earliest Homo sapiens had bodies with short, slender trunks and long limbs. These body proportions are an adaptation for surviving in tropical regions due to the greater proportion of skin surface available for cooling the body. More stocky builds gradually evolved when populations spread to cooler regions, as an adaptation that helped the body retain heat.
Modern humans now have an average height of about 160 centimetres in females and 175 centimetres in males.
Brain

Homo sapiens living today have an average brain size of about 1350 cubic centimetres which makes-up 2.2% of our body weight. Early Homo sapiens, however, had slightly larger brains at nearly 1500 cubic centimetres.
Skull

modern Homo sapiens skulls have a short base and a high braincase. Unlike other species of Homo, the skull is broadest at the top. The fuller braincase also results in almost no post-orbital constriction or narrowing behind the eye sockets
back of the skull is rounded and indicates a reduction in neck muscles
face is reasonably small with a projecting nose bone
brow ridge is limited and the forehead is tall
orbits (eye sockets) are square rather than round
Jaws and teeth

jaws are short which result in an almost vertical face
usually no gap (retromolar space) between the last molar teeth and the jaw bone
jaws are lightly built and have a protruding bony chin for added strength. Homo sapiens is the only species to have a protruding chin.
shortened jaw has affected the arrangement of the teeth within the jaw. They are now arranged in a parabolic shape in which the side rows of teeth splay outwards rather than remain parallel as in our earliest long jawed ancestors.
teeth are relatively small compared with earlier species. This is especially noticeable in the front incisor and canine teeth.
front premolar teeth in the lower jaw have two equal-sized cusps (bumps on the chewing surface)
Limbs and pelvis

limb bones are thinner and less robust than earlier human species and indicate a reduction in muscle size from earlier humans.
legs are relatively long compared with the arms.
finger and toe bones are straight and without the curvature typical of our earliest australopithecine ancestors.
pelvis is narrower from side-to-side and has a deeper bowl-shape from front-to-back than previous human species.
Lifestyle
Culture and technology
The earliest Homo sapiens had a relatively simple culture, although it was more advanced than any previous species. Rare evidence for symbolic behaviour appears at a number of African sites about 100,000 years ago, but these artistic expressions appear more of a flicker of creativity than a sustained expression. It is not until about 40,000 years ago that complex and highly innovative cultures appear and include behaviour that we would recognise as typical of modern humans today.

Many researchers believe this explosion of artistic material in the archaeological record about 40,000 years ago is due to a change in human cognition - perhaps humans developed a greater ability to think and communicate symbolically or memorise better. However, as there are obvious attempts at art before this, perhaps there are other reasons. One theory is that population size and structure play a key role as social learning is considered more beneficial to developing complex culture than individual innovations are. Bigger populations often accumulate more cultural attributes than isolated groups.

Tools
Initially, Homo sapiens made stone tools such as flakes, scrapers and points that were similar in design to those made by the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis). This technology appeared about 250,000 years ago, coinciding with the probable first appearance of early Homo sapiens. It required an ability for abstract thought to mentally plan a series of steps that could then be executed. Only a small number of tools were produced from each core (the original stone selected for shaping) but the tools produced by this prepared-core method maximised the cutting edge available. Historically, archaeologists used different terminologies for Lower Palaeolithic cultures in different parts of the world. Many of these terms are now consolidated within the Mode 3 technology to emphasise the similarities between these technologies.

As more sophisticated techniques developed in some parts of the world, this early Mode 3 technology was replaced by either Mode 4 or Mode 5 technology and the use of a wider range of materials including bone, ivory and antler. Mode 4 technology first appeared in Africa about 100,000 years ago. It is characterised by the production of long, thin stone flakes that were shaped into long blade knives, spearheads and other tools. Mode 5 technology specialised in the production of very small blades (microliths) that were often used in composite tools having several parts. These tools included small-headed arrows, barbed spears and sickles. Regional variation in these tool cultures developed with an influx of new styles and techniques especially within the last 40,000 years, including the Magdalenian and Aurignacian.

Fire
Sophisticated control of fire, including complex hearths, pits and kilns, allowed Homo sapiens to survive in regions that even the cold-adapted Neanderthals had been unable to inhabit.

The Cro-Magnon site at Dolni Vestonice in the Czech Republic produced the earliest evidence for high temperature kilns and ceramic technology. The kilns, dated at 26,000 years old, were capable of firing clay figurines at temperatures over 400 degrees Celsius. About 2000 fired lumps of clay were found scattered around the kiln.

Clothing and personal adornment
Animal hide clothing may have been worn in cooler areas, although direct evidence of clothing only exists for the last 30,000 years. This evidence includes specialised tools such as needles; adornments such as buttons and beads sewn onto clothing; and the remains of animals, such as arctic foxes and wolves, that indicate they were trapped for their fur. Clothes that were sewn provided better protection from the cold than clothes that were merely tied together.

Fibres from flax plants were discovered in a cave in Georgia in 2009, dating to about 36,000 years old. The flax was most likely used to make clothes and woven baskets, and a small number appear to be dyed. They are the oldest example of their kind ever found. Textile impressions have been discovered at other European sites have, but no actual remains.

Items of personal adornment not sewn onto clothing include ivory, shell, amber, bone and tooth beads and pendants. Ostrich eggshell beads that date from about 45,000 years ago have been found in Africa, as well as pierced shell beads in Morocco dating to 80,000 years ago and marine shell beads from Israel dating to 90,000 years old, but body adornment only become prolific from about 35,000 years ago.

One of the earliest known pendants is a horse carved in mammoth ivory from Vogelherd, Germany. It is dated at 32,000 years old. Body adornments like this are evidence that humans had progressed from merely trying to survive and were now concerned with their appearance.

Art
Cave art began to be produced about 40,000 years ago in Europe and Australia. Most of the art depicts animals or probable spiritual beings, but smaller marks in many caves in France, and possibly others in Europe, are now being analysed as they may be a written 'code' familiar to many prehistoric tribes. In particular, 26 symbols appear over and over again across thousand of years, some of them in pairs and groups in what could be a rudimentary 'language'. These suggest that early Europeans were attempting to represent ideas symbolically rather than realistically and share information acorss generations. The oldest of these symbols date to about 30,000 years old.

Evidence of musical instruments first appeared about 32,000 years ago in Europe. Palaeolithic bone flutes and whistles from various sites in France range in age from 30,000 to 10,000 years old.

Portable artwork, such as carved statuettes, first appeared about 35-40,000 years ago in Europe. Venus figurines were widespread in Europe by 28,000 years ago. Fragments from Germany found in 2009, suggest their origins started at least 35,000 years ago. An ivory female head with bun from Dolni Vestonice, Czech Republic, is one of only 2 human head carvings from this period that show eye sockets, eyelids and eyeballs. It is dated at 26,000 years old.

Red ochre pieces from Blombos Cave in South Africa, dating to about 100-80,000 years ago, show evidence of engraving that may be an expression of art or simply incidental marking made during other activities. However, other signs of possible symbolic behaviour, including shell beads and sophisticated tools (known as Still Bay points) have also come from this site, strengthening the case for early artistic expression.

Settlement
Early Homo sapiens often inhabited caves or rock shelters if these were available. More recently, especially within the last 20,000 years, natural shelters were enhanced with walls or other simple modifications. In open areas, shelters were constructed using a range of framework materials including wooden poles and the bones of large animals, such as mammoths. These structures were probably covered with animal hides and the living areas included fire hearths.

Living sites were much larger than those occupied by earlier humans and a comparison with modern traditional peoples suggests that clans consisted of between 25 and 100 members.

Burial
Burials were infrequent and very simple prior to 40,000 years ago and then began to become more elaborate with the inclusion of valued objects such as tools and body adornments. Red ochre was sprinkled over many of the bodies prior to burial.

One of the earliest deliberate burials of a modern human comes from Jebel Qafzeh in Israel. Dating to 90,000 years old, the grave contains the bones of a young woman buried with a young child at her feet. An additional 21 skeletons were found in the same cave.

Environment and diet
Early modern humans were adapted to life in the tropics but by 40,000 years ago they occupied a range of environments across the continents of Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia. Within the last 20,000 years humans have also spread into the Americas. Today, our culture and technology allows us to live in most environments on our planet as well as some off our planet.

All Homo sapiens were once hunter-gatherers living on wild plants and animals. It was only about 11,000 years ago that humans began to domesticate plants and animals although wild foods still remained important in the diet. Our species has a wide-ranging and essentially omnivorous diet. This has enabled us to utilise the food resources found in the wide variety of environments we inhabit.


- See more at: http://australianmuseum.net.au/Homo-sapiens-modern-humans#sthash.VIS2QXoi.dpuf


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 3:11:17 PM
Reply

http://www.pnas.org/content/108/37/15123.long#abstract-1

Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa


Messenger: RAS NATE Sent: 8/19/2014 3:43:47 PM
Reply

Bless up GA.

I see no 100 % proof we were or are apes still.Only a lot of indication and belief.That's becoz we are not.

Just becoz they found skulls of extinct monkeys doesn't mean it's our anscestors.Nuff animals extinct.

Here is another article that offers scientific facts as proof we are no
apes:

http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scienctific-facts-prove-theory-of.html?m=0

Man and animal are two different things and not relatives.
Man is above the animals.His reasoning power intellect are not things that came to him by chance after enough time.


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 7:22:56 PM
Reply

Is a joy to reason on this topic iya. But we were not monkeys nor apes!! Those skulls are not monkeys lol. Common ancestor...... its like you and your cousin. You dont come from your cousin but you have a common ancestor in your grandmother!

But im saying, look at all the creatures on jah planet...

How many land creatures are there with our same four limbs same pelvis shape same hands and feet. Only three creatures on the planet have opposable thumbs, the human, the great ape, and monkeys. We call these primates. It isn't beyond the realms of nature to auggest they could have all developed from a much earlier common ancestor.


Where does the I suppose the first form of life on the planet comes? Surely human beings, dinosaurs, all the birds bees and trees on the earth, as well as the earth, and the sun, , didnt all just happen to be all of a sudden at one time? They must have all evolved from something. Evolution offers a theory, from the big bang or creation, straight up to today for everything. The earth itself has evolved since its inception. The timeline puts things into perspective.



But by no means does science claim to have the whole story of evolution mapped out. Piece by piece....


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 7:39:55 PM
Reply

I think tru I have always had an interest in archeological anthropology re: ancient africa. ... I follow alot of the science on them 'findings' in the hands of more thieving European science guys

Dr Ben said we must watch them ;)


Messenger: Eleazar Sent: 8/19/2014 9:20:05 PM
Reply

Give Thanks for the articles Garvey. A lot of information to process.


Messenger: RAS NATE Sent: 8/20/2014 4:50:06 AM
Reply

Yes I give thanks for the reasoning.

Just becoz monkeys or apes are similar to man in some way doesn't mean we share a common anscestor.I main problem with this is the claim that MAN was not created at all on this earth.They come tell InI there were only animals and somehow one species and specific sort developed into intelligent man..

The I them know the DNA of pigs is astonishingly close to human DNA?

Surely if some spiritually blind scientist come and tell I that we are somehow related to pigs or share a common anscestor Iman would Bun that.So I Bun the ape thing same way.

Selassie Bless And Guide
JAH RasTafarI


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/20/2014 6:14:04 AM
Reply

Pigs:


Humans and chimpanzees share a much more recent common ancestor than humans and pigs. This results in humans sharing more of their genome with chimps than they do with pigs. Even though a human's genetic code is more like a chimp's than it is like a pig's, all eukaryotic organisms share a significant amount of genetic code, vertebrates share even more, and mammals share even more than that, (and PRIMATES even more....) a human's DNA more closely resembles a pig's than it does a lizard's, and it more closely resembles a lizard's than it does a bacterium's.
Scientists have discovered about 20,000 mammalian genes that encode proteins with similar basic functions," ABC Science quoted Moran as saying. "So if you compare the protein-encoding portion of our DNA, we have a lot in common with a lot of mammals."

I don't know how it would be possible for hueMAN to be formed 'suddenly' out of nothing, as a fully formed modern human being. Or anything at that matter. Maybe its the timeline that puts people off - I man am saying that I and I are formed from the DUST of the earth........ no different to creationist, InI just say that this may have took millions of years rather than 1 day.

Bless Up Ras Nate keep the fire Blazing


1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 49

Return to Reasoning List




RastafarI
 
Haile Selassie I