Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List
 

Here is a link to this page:
http://www.jah-rastafari.com/forum/message-view.asp?message_group=5534&start_row=91


Haile Selassie I is the retuned Jesus Christ

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 132
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: zion mountain Sent: 3/29/2014 3:45:26 PM
Reply

God is within,not without,see God thru all His an Her Iration(because babylon made we think God is a He).

Hence bible aint necessary for I spiritual growth.


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 3/29/2014 4:00:19 PM
Reply

King Ezana didn't need a Bible, even Philip and his Ethiopian Eunuch didn't have a Bible. Infact, Christ himself, and all other people within the bible did not have a Bible.....

But in this time, we MUST read the Bible right?

If you can use the Bible to reAch a elevated level of consciousness without being lead stray by any potential corruption within the Bible then all praises be to Jah for your efforts. May it long continue. But if you don't use the Bible, and are able to use other methods / texts / knowledge to elevate your consciousness then someone has no right to tell you you MUST have bible

Note the keywords here are must and necessary


Messenger: Eleazar Sent: 3/29/2014 5:41:41 PM
Reply

-------------------
If you can use the Bible to reAch a elevated level of consciousness without being lead stray by any potential corruption within the Bible then all praises be to Jah for your efforts. May it long continue. But if you don't use the Bible, and are able to use other methods / texts / knowledge to elevate your consciousness then someone has no right to tell you you MUST have bible
-------------------

Yes I, I agree with that.



Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 3/31/2014 12:52:46 PM
Reply

Some claim this as the proof they need to show there was no Jesus Christ. That's debateable. What it does show is the Jesus Christ that WE (not those in Ethiopia) have been told about is a complete lie and we have all been raised to pray to a Roman enslaver. These two images below we now know are of the same man:





Ptolemy 1 Meryamun Setepenre (c.a. 367-283 B.C.E- Before Common Era) (aka Soter) (“Soter” means savior) became the first European pharaoh of Egypt through military force led by Alexander the Greek (a.k.a Alexander the Great). When Ptolemy became pharaoh of Egypt, he wanted the Egyptians to consecrate him as a god. He wanted to be called a god because that was the title all of the pharaohs of Egypt were called prior to him. However, the people of Egypt refused to call him a god because they knew the only reason he became a pharaoh was through force, so in “305 BC -Ptolemy took the title of Pharaoh, taking the Egyptian name Meryamun Setepenre, which means “Beloved of Amun (Amun means God) Chosen of Ra(Ra means God)”, and because of the Egyptians refusal to acknowledge him as a God, he began killing the people of Egypt, which caused the Egyptian priests at Memphis to give into his request by agreeing to consecrate him to priesthood, in order to save their own lives.

The key words in the above passage to keep in mind during your reading: Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter, which are words that were used to create the fictitious character of JESUS CHRIST in AD by Roman Emperor Constantine (Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter were used in B.C). The images of Ptolemy below, which are similar to the images that are depicted as “Jesus” today, were forced upon the Africans and were ordered to be worshipped by the people of Rome. Let us continue to A.D.



Serapis Christus Greco Roman c.a 135 B.C.E. The marble image in the London museum is the image they use of Christ (Jesus) today. Christus was also the nickname for Serapis.

What is Serapis? (Origin of JESUS CHRIST)

Ptolemy’s rule was to create a deity that would be worshipped by both the Egyptians and the Greeks. He created “Serapis “, the made up Graeco-Egyptian god that was invented in the 3rd century B.C., portrayed as Greek in appearance, but with Egyptian accessories, representing both wealth and resurrection.

“Egypt, which you commended to me my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshippers of Serapis here are called Christians and those who are devoted to the god Serapis (I find) call themselves Bishops of Christ. Hadrian to Servianus 134 AD.”

Constantine and Arius

Constantine the Greek (a.k.a Constantine the Great) Roman Emperor from 306 to 337, is known for being the first Roman emperor to be converted to Christianity which strangely enough, Arius of Libya (256-356 AD) born of African descent centuries after Ptolemy 1, had a problem with the Roman empire teaching the Africans and the people of Rome to worship a statue and celebrating death. He was considered a heretic, a professed believer (of God), who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church (what the religious authorities usually controlled by government deem as the truth). Because he started attracting so many followers due to his teachings that were contrary to the Romans, Constantine called the council by summoning all the bishops to discredit Arius, The Council of Nicaea. During the time when this meeting was called upon, there was no mention of Jesus Christ at all; no man had ever existed by the name JESUS Christ, and an important fact is that this all took place Anno Domino (AD) (which Christians claim means after the death of Christ) but in Latin means ‘in the year of the lord’. The name Jesus Christ didn’t exist before the meeting was called (read the statements made during that timeframe). It was only after this that they presented to the people the name JESUS CHRIST.

What Lord are they referring to? Kings have always been referred to as Lords or gods.

If Jesus Christ didn’t exist during the time this meeting took place nor ever heard of whom are people worshipping today? Serapis Christus?

Nicean Creed – Jesus Christ is born

Nicean creed which became the statement of the Christian faith was written decreed and sanctified by 318 Roman Catholic bishops at the council in 325 AD (some believe this transformation took place “Council of Chalcedon” 451AD).

“We believe in one God the Father all-powerful of all things both seen and unseen one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God the only begotten from the father, that is from the substance of the father, god from god, light from light, true god from true god, begotten not made, consubstantial with the father, through whom all things came to be both those in heaven and those in earth for us humans and for out salvation he came down and became incarnate became human suffered and rose up on the third day went up into the heavens is coming to judge the living and the dead and in the holy spirit” (The origin of the Trinity)

The authorities shut Arius down and threatened him with death to keep his mouth shut. They positioned the creed during the time when people started becoming aware of the lies and deception, and ordered all books to be burned; destroying all ancient writings, “no evidence no argument”, and the outcome was the transformation from Serapis Christus, which means Christ the Savior, to Jesus Christ by edict of Emperor Constantine in 325 AD.

Christians, do your research. There may have been a man that walked the earth in the land known as Nazareth that attempted to guide the people back to righteousness, but, this man was not JESUS CHRIST. You see no mention of any man in Nazareth named JESUS mentioned during the meetings in Rome, or of a woman named Mary (the virgin) giving birth to a child named Jesus.

This would explain why there is so much emphasis put on JESUS CHRIST in the bible, which further explains why God all of a sudden had to have a “son” (sun of God was turned to the son of God by Europeans, which is why every picture of Jesus has the sun behind his head. (Sun Ra, Sun of Ra (God)). The man you acknowledge as Jesus Christ of Nazareth was born in 4 BC; all of the above took place before that date.


“The only thing necessary for falsehood to triumph is for good men and good women to remain silent.”





Messenger: RasTafarIWork Sent: 3/31/2014 2:40:03 PM
Reply

GA, in your opinion, do Selassie I know this history that you present, ie do He also claim that jesus never existed?


Messenger: RAS-NATE-1995 Sent: 3/31/2014 2:48:16 PM
Reply

Yes GARVEYS AFRICA my lord.The I is making an interesting point.I like the idea of the changing of SUN to SON.The son of god thing also always seemed confusing to I.Coz the Christ is known to InI as God in flesh and thus God.So what they are saying is that he is the son of himself...HOW CAN THAT BE???

The I probably also heard of the man named Caesar Borgia.He was the son of the roman pope Alexander VI.

Is it just me or does this look like the man on they cross they pray to...?

Caesar Borgia (Jesus)


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 3/31/2014 3:47:28 PM
Reply

Rastafari work; hail brethren, rasta works must continue. Haile Selassie never worshipped Ptolemy like we in the West. Ethiopia have long hailed Black prophets and priests. And when the Coptic church and the early Christians came to bring a Christianity to Ethiopia they didn't impose their imagery like they did with us, Infact in the 16th century they tried to and were ran out of Ethiopia. The Ethiopians don't even deal with the wordsound "Jesus"

So Haile Selassie doesn't come into this argument. What I posted disproves the existance of a Jesus as we were told by western religion, with the Name and the imagery being false. Whether there was an actual Christ / Kristos then of course his majesty's religion would suggest so. But even then how did the Ethiopian royalty first learn of Christ? It wasn't by divine intervention..... I made another thread on that though. Debateable.


Ras Nate (or Jah Dub!) I agree. And it is the spitting image of that Cesar. But this Ptolemy figure head was the first of its kind - the original European image of God given to Africans to emulate the God-like adoration of the Pharoahs (that they had just killed / replaced). And then we find the same features in the image you posted above which is the typical "Christ look".

Whether ones believe in the man or not, this typical Christ image has to get a fire


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 3/31/2014 4:04:20 PM
Reply



If I were a Christian I know which id pray to,

The sad thing is, when I was a Christian, due to the way it had been given to me I never once thought to challenge the image of white Christ and thought alternative thinking would be blasphemous. Who is the Blasphemer!?

Remove the image of Ptolemy Christ from your mind.

Haile Selassie worshipped this Christ




Messenger: RasTafarIWork Sent: 3/31/2014 4:07:24 PM
Reply

GA I appreciate that you have time, energy and resource to dissaprove jesus (with whatever speling) and the bible.
Not so with I, for by The Word of His Imperial Majesty Emperor Haile Selassie I, in I Irit I know that the man called jesus of nazareth Is the head conner stone, RastafarI is the Imovable mover, and is not about or ever to go over a paradigm shift.


Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 3/31/2014 4:10:26 PM
Reply

It's what I do.

Ok I see what level your dealing with. This isn't Garveys Africa disproving the man in the Bible your talking about. I am talking misconception.

Let me ask you, does the I know of Haile Selassie using the wordsound "Jesus Christ" ?

Do you see what I'm saying king?

And does Haile Selassie deal with this?



Does he deal with a white saviour with long hair and blue eyes? The same one we - in the west have been subjected to?

No


1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6061 - 7071 - 8081 - 9091 - 100
101 - 110111 - 120121 - 130131 - 132

Return to Reasoning List




RastafarI
 
Haile Selassie I