Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website  
Return to Reasoning List
 

Here is a link to this page:
http://www.jah-rastafari.com/forum/message-view.asp?message_group=2680&start_row=1


White slaves

1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 43
Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)
Messenger: Gizzmo Sent: 3/26/2008 4:46:10 PM
Reply

I have been doing some research on slavery,and I found that there were white slaves to both Black and White Masters.In such places as North Africa,Barbados,Jamaca,and North America.These slaves came from Italy,france,spain,portugal,England,and Iceland.Mostly from the Coasts of the said countries.

I find many people shy away from this topic,but I would like to get your opinions on the matter.

P.S.
from what I can gather 1/2 the slaves in the united states were white and North Africa had over 1 million european slaves.


Messenger: Ras Bredren Nicholas Sent: 3/27/2008 7:56:47 AM
Reply

Blessed Love InI Idren. Jah Live RasTafarI!!

InI 400 years are done. Why would I want to return I focus to such Matters.

the Fact of it is though, is that slavery is slavery, no matter if its a HUE-man, the truth behind slavery stands so tall I can see it towering the Earth from here.

Iman I-Jah pray all may share in the bounty of knowledge, Wise-mind, and Overstanding. I ask that it Be Jah will for InI to always stay mindful of the needs of others throughout Iration. Through Word-sound Power and Livity, through faith and strength, InI give thanks and Ises unto the Father, Qedamawee qedamawee, Negusa Neghast, AdonaI Jah RASTAFARI!!!! Truth and Justice forIver prevail.


Messenger: Ras Sistren Khamyl Sent: 4/2/2008 2:13:40 PM
Reply

The reason that many shy away from the subject is because the state sponsored slave system that resulted from the Trans Atlantic slave trade differed from all other systems. This system dehumanized Afrikans and Native Americans to the point that the laws that governed the land upheld the barbaric torture they were subjected to. State sponsored racism allowed any offense to be justified as "slavery" and therefore okay.

Although the term slavery is used in other instances of servitude, the meaning is very different. Slavery in the United Snakes of Amerikkka was the only instance in which individuals could be born into slavery and could not work or buy themselves free. It is also unique in that human beings where stolen from their land, allowed to be starved and chained until they could be sold. In other instances, slavery was part of their class system, meaning that slaves were considered human beings and had rights that protected them from dehumanizing conditions. Most slaves were the result of tribal wars and servitude of the surrendering faction was a legal result. This is not considered kidnapping because either side could become the master and enslave the other. There was also endentured servitude even in the United States by which a person could offer him/her self as a servant to pay off debts. Even in this situation there were regulations as to what could or could not be done to them and their offspring were not predestined to become the personal property of their master.

Rape torture murder false imprisonment dismemberment genocide haulocaust (Slavery in Amerikkka)google "without sanctuary"

Servitude (Slavery every where else)

Please feel free to reason concerning anything you want more info on. The way to "free - dome" is through overstanding!
.


Messenger: Ras Sistren Khamyl Sent: 4/2/2008 2:20:01 PM
Reply

Four hundred years of one particular type of slavery is gone.

The slavement of people in general is an ongoing battle to overcome.

With all due RASpeckt, I must insist that we do not become so complacent that we not real eyes that the worst is yet to come. Socialized conditioning and programming has transformed the masses into modern day programmed self destructing entities. The only way to alleviate this phenomenon is to expose it.

RSK




Messenger: Ras Bredren Nicholas Sent: 4/2/2008 10:12:25 PM
Reply

Yes I always. Ises.

In the meantime, until things for the mundane really start to get real, InI must continue InI Diligent works Spiritually and Physically.

For this realization, and future ones to come, I give thanks and Ises for bein Blessed to have the system broken down before InI, so We as Jah people can Maintain For the sake of HIM name. So yes InI, Bless-ed, truely. Soon come. Jah bless all the while. RasTafarI.




Messenger: ROOK FARI SELAH Sent: 4/14/2008 8:02:57 AM
Reply


I WASNT AVOIDING THE TOPIC JUST A LITTLE SURPRISED SOME ONE COMPARED INDENTURED SERVITUDE TO AFRICAN HOLOCAUST
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHERE ANY ONE SAYS 1/2 OF THE SLAVES IN AMERICA WERE WHITE IF U HAVE A REFRENCE I CAN LOOK AT..WHERE AND WHEN
WHITE SERVENTS WERE MOSTLY PRISONERS SERVING OUT THE REST OF THEIR SENTENCE OR TRICKED IN TO THINKIN THEY WERE GOING TO THWE WEST TO WORK AND GET RICH
ALSO
LET ME SAY THAT NO ONE EVER CAME TO ENGLAND LOADED A BOAT SARDINE STYLE ,AND SET OFF TO AMERICA [WEST INDIES]
JUST KNOWING WHAT WENT ON IN ELMINA SLAVE CASTLE AND ALL OTHERS ....
IS ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT BEFORE EVEN LEAVING AFRICA THE AUTROCITY WAS TO BIG FOR WORDS ...
MY PEOPLE THERE IS NOTHING IN OUR HISTORY THAT COMPARES TO THE AFRICAN HOLOCAUST THEN OR NOW...
IOM NOT SAYIN THAT WHITE SERVENTS WERENT MISTREATRED THEY WERE
BUT I WOULDNT EVEN PUT THEM IN THE SAME "BOAT "
AND THEY WERENT ON THE SAME BOAT
UN LESS THEY WERE A DECK HAND
THEY SURELY WERENT ELBOW TO ELBOW, NOT ABLE TO STAND TO USE THE BATH ROOM..

DOES WHAT UVE READ TELL U HOW MANY WHITE WOMAN WERE BEATIN AND PISSED ON
HOW MANY WHITE WOMAN WERE RAPED OR SOLD INTO SLAVERY?????
BLESSED LOVE


Messenger: ROOK FARI SELAH Sent: 4/14/2008 9:53:09 AM
Reply

I was looking for what you were talking about
IS THIS IT? ...
WHITE SLAVERY
Two years ago, Prime Minister Paul Keating of Australia refused to show "proper respect" to Britain's Queen Elizabeth II during her state visit. In response, Terry Dicks, a Conservative member of the British Parliament said, "It's a country of ex-convicts, so we should not be surprised by the rudeness of their prime minister."

A slur such as this would be considered unthinkable if it were uttered against any other class or race of people except the descendants of White slavery. Dicks' remark is not only offensive, it is ignorant and false. Most of Australia's "convicts" were shipped into servitude for such "crimes" as stealing seven yards of lace, cutting trees on an aristocrat's estate or poaching sheep to feed a starving family.

The arrogant disregard for the holocaust visited upon the poor and working class Whites of Britain by the aristocracy continues in our time because the history of that epoch has been almost completely extirpated from our collective memory.

When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary "indentured servitude" or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The "convicts" transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000.

The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master's silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of White slaves who were worked to death in this country from the early l7th century onward.

Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.

Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia.

The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.

In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved "forever." The service of Whites bound to Berkeley's Hundred was deemed "perpetual." These accounts have been policed out of the much touted "standard reference works" such as Abbott Emerson Smith's laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage.

I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more "servitude" on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery.

In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York's Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship's hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish.

Olmsted inquired about this to a shipworker. "Oh," said the worker, "the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything."

Before British slavers traveled to Africa's western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred ("the surplus poor" as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement.

According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: "A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America."

The center of the trade in child-slaves was in the port cities of Britain and Scotland:

"Press gangs in the hire of local merchants roamed the streets, seizing 'by force such boys as seemed proper subjects for the slave trade.' Children were driven in flocks through the town and confined for shipment in barns...So flagrant was the practice that people in the countryside about Aberdeen avoided bringing children into the city for fear they might be stolen; and so widespread was the collusion of merchants, shippers, suppliers and even magistrates that the man who exposed it was forced to recant and run out of town." (Van der Zee, Bound Over, p. 210).

White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. A White slave would be confined to a hole not more than sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship's stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease which would sweep through the "cargo" of White "freight" chained in the bowels of the ship.

Ships carrying White slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger, "Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [White] servants at certain times equaled that for [Black] slaves in the 'middle passage,' and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves." Salinger reports a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for Black slaves on board ships enroute to America compared with a death rate of 25% for White slaves enroute to America.

Foster R. Dulles writing in Labor in America: A History, states that whether convicts, children 'spirited' from the countryside or political prisoners, White slaves "experienced discomforts and sufferings on their voyage across the Atlantic that paralleled the cruel hardships undergone by negro slaves on the notorious Middle Passage."

Dulles says the Whites were "indiscriminately herded aboard the 'white guineamen,' often as many as 300 passengers on little vessels of not more than 200 tons burden--overcrowded, unsanitary...The mortality rate was sometimes as high as 50% and young children seldom survived the horrors of a voyage which might last anywhere from seven to twelve weeks."

Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of White slaves, "The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death."

Marcus Jernegan describes the greed of the shipmasters which led to horrendous loss of life for White slaves transported to America:

"The voyage over often repeated the horrors of the famous 'middle passage' of slavery fame. An average cargo was three hundred, but the shipmaster, for greater profit, would sometimes crowd as many as six hundred into a small vessel...The mortality under such circumstances was tremendous, sometimes more than half...Mittelberger (an eyewitness) says he saw thirty-two children thrown into the ocean during one voyage."

"The mercantile firms, as importers of (White) servants, were not too careful about their treatment, as the more important purpose of the transaction was to get ships over to South Carolina which could carry local produce back to Europe. Consequently the Irish--as well as others--suffered greatly...

"It was almost as if the British merchants had redirected their vessels from the African coast to the Irish coast, with the white servants coming over in much the same fashion as the African slaves." (Warren B. Smith, White Servitude in Colonial South Carolina).

A study of the middle passage of White slaves was included in a Parliamentary Petition of 1659. It reported that White slaves were locked below deck for two weeks while the slaveship was still in port. Once under way, they were "all the way locked up under decks...amongst horses." They were chained from their legs to their necks.

Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin - "Slavs."

Moreover, in the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed White children as young as six years of age. They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. Hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks.

White Children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, eight and ten year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920.

Because of the rank prostitution, stupidity and cowardice of America's teachers and educational system, White youth are taught that Black slaves, Mexican peons and Chinese coolies built this country while the vast majority of the Whites lorded it over them with a lash in one hand and a mint julep in the other.

The documentary record tells a very different story, however. When White Congressman David Wilmot authored the Wilmot Proviso to keep Black slaves out of the American West he did so, he said, to preserve that vast expanse of territory for "the sons of toil, my own race and color."

This is precisely what most White people in America were, "sons of toil," performing backbreaking labor such as few of us today can envision. They had no paternalistic welfare system; no Freedman's Bureau to coo sweet platitudes to them; no army of bleeding hearts to worry over their hardships. These Whites were the expendable frontline soldiers in the expansion of the American frontier. They won the country, felled the trees, cleared and planted the land.

The wealthy, educated White elite in America are the sick heirs of what Charles Dickens in Bleak House termed "telescopic philanthropy"--the concern for the condition of distant peoples while the plight of kindred in one's own backyard are ignored.

Today much of what we see on "Turner Television" and Pat Robertson's misnamed "Family Channel," are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths of the White slaves sent to Britain's sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year.

Soldiers in the American Revolution and sailors impressed into the American navy received upwards of two hundred whiplashes for minor infractions. But no TV show lifts the shirt of these White yeoman to reveal the scars on their backs.

The Establishment would rather weep over the poor persecuted Negroes, but leave the White working class "rednecks" and "crackers" (both of these terms of derision were first applied to White slaves), to live next door to the Blacks.

Little has changed since the early 1800s when the men of property and station of the English Parliament outlawed Black slavery throughout the Empire. While this Parliament was in session to enact this law, ragged five year old White orphan boys, beaten, starved and whipped, were being forced up the chimneys of the English parliament, to clean them. Sometimes the chimney masonry collapsed on these boys. Other times they suffocated to death inside their narrow smoke channels.

Long after Blacks were free throughout the British Empire, the British House of Lords refused to abolish chimney-sweeping by White children under the age of ten. The Lords contended that to do so would interfere with "property rights." The lives of the White children were not worth a farthing and were considered no subject for humanitarian concern.

The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of "Affirmative action," "minority set-asides" and proposed "Reparations to African-Americans" will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of "the sons of toil."

There will only be racial peace when knowledge of radical historical truths are widespread and both sides negotiate from positions of strength and not from fantasies of White working class guilt and the uniqueness of Black suffering.

Let it be said, in many cases Blacks in slavery had it better than poor Whites in the antebellum South. This is why there was such strong resistance to the Confederacy in the poverty-stricken areas of the mountain south, such as Winston County in Alabama and the Beech mountains of North Carolina. Those poor Whites could not imagine why any White laborer would want to die for the slave-owning plutocracy that more often than not, gave better care and attention to their Black servants than they did to the free white labor they scorned as "trash."

To this day, the White ruling class denigrates the White poor and patronizes Blacks.

If this seems admirable from the pathological viewpoint of Marxism or cosmopolitan liberalism, the Black and Third World "beneficiaries" of White ruling class "esteem" ought to consider what sort of "friends" they actually have.

The Bible declares that the man who does not take care of his own family is "worse than an infidel." This also applies to one's racial kindred. The man who neglects his own children to care for yours has true love for neither.

White, self-hating liberals and greed-head conservatives who claim to care for the "civil rights" of Black and Third World people, discard the working class of their own people on the garbage heap of history. When they are finished with their own they shall surely turn on others.

Those who care for their own kind first are not practicing "hate" but kindness, which is the very root of the word.

Michael A. Hoffman II is the author of "They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America and Industrial Britain".

THE MAN WHO WROTE THIS SOUNDS LIKE HE WS LOOKING FOR A COMPARISON OR JUSTIFICATION OR MAKE THE AFRICAN HOLOCOST COMPAREABLE TO THE EVENTS STATED
IM NOT MAKING ANY SLAVERY ALRIGHT FOR ANY PEOPLE WHITE OR BLACK
BUTTTTTT...NOTHING IN THEM TIMES COMPARED TO AFRICAN HOLOCOST
IN MY OPINION...
FYAH BUN SLAVERY
RAPE AND GENOCIDE



Messenger: ROOK FARI SELAH Sent: 4/14/2008 10:11:31 AM
Reply

P.S "Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves"..
I DONT THINK THAT MEANS 1/2 OF ALL SLAVES WERE WHITE...
THAT MEANS THAT HALF OF ALL "FIRST" ARRIVALS IN THE COLONIES WERE WHITE SLAVES
BUT THE BLACK SLAVES THAT CAME TO THE U S AND WEST INDIES
NOT TO MENTION THOSE WHO DIED WERE COUNTLESS
NOT COMPAREABLE
ITS STILL F ED UP BUT
WHITE SLAVES EVENTUALLY WERE ABLE TO SHAKE OFF THE HATE IF THEY WERE EVER HATED
U DONT WALK DOWN THE STREET AND IDENTIFY A WHITE PERSON AS SLAVE
AND SAY
THATS REDNECK LIKE THEY DO WITH BLACK PEOPLE
MOST PEOPLE WHO CALL THEMSELVES RED NECKS ARE RACIST
AND DO NOT IDENTIFY WITH THEIR FORMER SLAVE FAMILIES..




Messenger: Khu-Ra-El Sent: 4/20/2008 11:03:55 AM
Reply

To the man Rook

His questions and accountings are not well considered, or is he aiming to achieve something?

Slavery

Ist not possibly anymore to say how many lives were destroyed in this barbarous way abomiably. But this is also not of the main importance. Every single cry, every moaning of a victim of the ravage of human foolishness would earn it to function eternally as an aching thorn in the conscience of humanity.


In the name of all tortured and slaved people, woman man and children, specially from the white people, we want to thank you for the belittlement.
Slave: greek verb skyleùo („make loot“)
Latin sclavus fort he ethnic group of the so called slavic people.

the vikings had intensive commercial relashionships with the war loot, wich the sold as slaves to the orient. The european slaves were called saqaliba.

8th to 12th century – was a big deal with european slaves, specially in egypt and islamic countries, specially white women to rape and white men fort he egytian army.
In 1512 , the native american slavery was forbidden by the spanish king ferdinand the 5th.



In 1526 the first african slave consignment reached cuba.
….

From the 15th to the 19th century came more than 11 million africans to the colonies of the americas. The number of the imprisoned and transported african slaves was basically higher, but most of our black brothers and sisters died on that deamonous way during the transport.

Inner african slave trade
Within africans slaved africans, number of victims 10 to 15 millions.

Oriental slave trade
Transsahara-trade: through east afrikan slavetrade reached slaves from afrika the arabic islamic world. African woman were brought to the harem and the african men were used as eunuchs. Also catalan traders were looking for the demand of slaves for egypt, european men for the army and the women for the harem. Number of victims 6- 17 million people.

Potugese slave trade
In 1455 the romanus pontifex allowed to slave pagans. Therefore had the portugese their justification for the slavery. First senegal had a big importance fort he slave trade, lateron the gold coast. The portugese had intensive commercial relationships with the local rich. In elmina emerged a powerful tradingplace in wich slaves were sold from african traders.

Atlantic slave trade
The atlantic slave trade is a trilateral trade. European slave traders bought slaves on the african coast and transported them to america, where they had to work in plantations and pits. The traders then sold the products from there with profit in europe. Because the war was the most important source for prisoners, wich could be sold as slaves to the europeans, also led the slave trade to more conflicts inside of africa. Wars were directly fueled to receive more slaves. Through that also the colonialisation of the europeans could take place.

In septemeber 1926, 44 nations signed an agreement against slavery, but nothing had changed.
In 1948 slavery was again forbidden in the 4th article of the human rights, but with a similar effect.
In 1956 anew 40 states signed an agreemet against slavery, what did it bring?
In april 2006 terre des hommes published that more than 12 million people are living within the modern forms of slavery. Thatfrom are more than the half children und teens. It is about human trafficking and corvee. These facts were comfirmed by the united nations.
Specially women of all skincolors are forced prostitutes, that are getting raped every day.

And now we come to the white women, listen well what happened.


They came with their white christ to europe and wanted to capture every single square inch. They crossed the land with dead and destruction, because they came without divine essence, but with hate and no overstandig of the true Christ!


More than 9 million innocent white women became victims of that holocaust in europe.
The inquisition (lat. Interrogation) was the forerunner of gestapo, kgb and stasi, they caused during the 13th and 18th century more than 10 million lives of human beeings in europe and more than 90 millions were sitting in prisons, they were tortured for years and forced to a confession. There were only two options dead or confession (white christ catholic church slaves).


In in the 20th century between 1941 and 43, in the catholic croatia 750.000 serbain orthodox white people were killed in the name of the white christ.

From 1933 until 1945 died 6.3 million jews and so many uncounted roma, sinti and regime adversaries within hitlers holocaust.

Ruanda – within 100 days 800.000 people were killed. Catholic priests and nuns helped the murderers.
On april 14th, the massacre of kibeho started, 15.000 refugees, that were looking for shelter wihtin the church area, were chopped to death, slayn and mutilated within two days. Witnesses blamed the catholic priests and nuns to have suppurted the genocide on the tutsis.
Native americans

In the 15th century in haiti there were 1,1 million inhabitants, the white christ people came ot capture haiti, after a few years there were only 46.000 people, today there are 1000.
And then the head of this church said: here was attained good and beauty through victims…

What does that man mean? The dead of the natives?

These men, in the name of the white christ did not apologise in the name of the white chruch, but give the fault to the sons and daughters.
Where is their confession of the slavery on the black brothers and sisters, what they were talking about in 1985 already, and where ist he confession to the promise towards the native americans wich they mentioned in 1992, and when is there coming a confession towards the white women , the white sisters and white brothers, towards whom they did not apologize until today.

So be careful my brothers and sisters , it seems as if this man is comning with the black christ on the same way. I have read much here, he also want to capture every square inch in the name of the black christ, and the slogans black over white is ever right (movie), aslike the white racists are saying white over black is a good attack. Where is the difference between a white xxx clan and a black xxx clan, i can´t see any. I can also see no difference in slaved people, no matter of wich skincolor. So what you mean man? Look around the world to china, tibet, afghanistan, russia, usbekistan, romania, congo, sudan, zimbabwe and so many more states in wich the people are slaved.

He is belitteling the committed crimes after his own doctrine, this flagrant belitteling is taking one´s breath away. Does he think that that is black supremacy?
Revelation of john concerning the secularized churches from the big whore babylon, that are wallowing in riches and are federating with the frowning powers of world´s history and why it is written in the revelation: move out of her my people, so that you don´t have part on her sin.

Khu-Ra-El



Messenger: ciriefader Sent: 4/20/2008 12:16:03 PM
Reply

Ge
I am glad it wasnt all white AND ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF people that did those horrible things

the queen and the government still has most of its white people and also people who have lived in sunnier countries
they have them all in slavery with the money system

infact most people in Britain are worse off than slaves because they actually have less than enough to survive and get into debt with the bank and then move address
this is the way many people live in the uk

and in the 1930's they had a workhouse and all poor people would be forced to work in the workhouse

the sad thing is that the people have been stitched up and actually blame it on themselves thinking it is because they didnt do better at school or because they arent trying hard enough

what a con!!
this money thing is a very clever way of enslaving most white people


the ironic thing is that in Zimbabwe
president mugabe has driven out this influence
and people there have a chance to go back into the jungle and live in paradise
AND THEY MOAN AND SAY THEY WANT TO STILL HAVE MONEY AND WESTERN THINGS ETC ETC

YA CANT WIN MAN!






1 - 1011 - 2021 - 3031 - 4041 - 43

Return to Reasoning List




RastafarI
 
Haile Selassie I