Just as the I admits that there are differences, ofcourse i admit that there are similarities, how could there not be when they are the same people from the same areas.
I think the difference in your thinking and mine, is that you seem to think that Ithiopia and KMT are the same with some differences
while i think that they are different from eachother with some similarities
the i see it?
I am not going to compare Axum and Lalibela which were built at a much later date to what is in KMT, and besides, i thought that when i mentioned that Lalibela is new Jerusalem you would keep in mind that it is a Judeo christian site, so to compare that to Luxor, even if
they have architectural similarities, is strange to i
And if we are to keep speaking of architectural similarities
I will go so far as to say, even after having the same basic people from the same geographical area, there is more similarities between KMT and South America, mexico and peru, than KMT and Ihiopia
Another surprising thing to i is, i didnt expect to hear a man who seems to study KMT so well would repeat what is in i opinion that old lie, that the pyramids are just tombs and shrines
Anyways, when i was speaking of the pyramid in the earlier post, i was speaking more of its symbology.
I mean who do you think taught the world how to rule people?
Who taught the world how the few could rule the many?
And that is the major thing that seperated KMT
INI Africans went from living as free men and women who travelled distances freely, teaching and spreading civilisation, and i mean civilization in its truest form, love and honour and respect for eachother, One God, to farm, how to live with one another in peace....but then in KMT, something happened, and civilisation began to mean something else, it became the buliding of great cities,monuments,Temples etc....and so began the down trodding of people...the few sitting on top while the many slave to earn a little.
That is why you see it on the dollar today.
That is the student giving honour to his master, the i see it
Still though, like i said before , keep studying, and feel free to share what you find
No one is asking you to ignore anything
i am glad for what the i write, specially on your last paragraph
The i say "I would also need to say that my devotion to His Majesty is based not on faith, but on knowledge and direct experience."
That is exactly what ini faith is built on, knowledge and experience.
lol but perhaps we are using different senses of the word faith
Still, i will admit that it makes i a little uncomfortable to read "it is possible to see His Majesty as One who existed in human consciousness before the Judeo-Christian lineage, and there is evidence left by His Majesty to prove this."
If you know HIM to be Almighy God in flesh, what is there to prove? That God was here in the beginning ?
|
|
