I have never at any point asked anyone to believe anything (review my posts if you need validity on that).
I state fact, I couldn't care less who believes what, when. I do however expect to be respected enough to not have my mother's name/reputation made light/fun of. I am quite upset at the onslaught of male dominance/arrogance that immediatly decided it was apropriate to attack my statement without any proof that I had made a false statment. I don't need to be believed to know or speak truth. You can direct a man to an oasis but you can't make him believe it exists.
"Men were supposed to be the equals of the living angels who unceasingly sang praises before the eternal God."
This can't possibly be truth for two reasons.
1. God does not make mistakes, if this were the truth, then it would be the truth still.
(side note: Men are Angels, Son of Man is Atum, Eve is womb of Man together they create Hue-mans who bring light to Mankind, those who are made in Man's image.) God does not have 'supposed to be's. The word angel referes to a office, not a species. Any good theologian can tell you that Angels are created and humans are born. One refers to a physical being while another refers to a job description. They are therefore not really comparable, any being can also be an Angel.
2. Why would you make an equal to something you have already made. That's like saying batteries were supposed to be equal to electricity. Or domestic pigs were supposed to be equals to wild boars.
Only human beings make things in the image or likeness of other things. That theory is illogical, it is human in nature, not divine. It is the concept that makes a statment like "man's best friend" when refering to a dog. Man's best friend is Womb-man, because she gives him the ability to create life. A dog is what a man gets to replace a family or to stand in for him, when he is away. God makes new things, each for a specific purpose, not as a companion to another, previous creation, but as individual thing that matters on its own. Each being is responsible for itself, there is no such thing as a free life; a life that doesn't ever have to be paid for by the recipient.
"So that the spirit of the cursed will not gain predominance over the human race whom Christ redeemed with his blood, all peace loving people should cooperate to stand firm in order to preserve and promote lawfulness and peace."
Christ served as witness, as did all other prophets, so that a life lived could be judged in context. It is pure folly to live a life that is governed by the concept that someone (no matter how divine) could possibly erase sins that have not yet occured. If Jesus the Christ could have died for all sins then sin would have ceased to exist upon the death of his physical being. To think that Christ died for you (whomever you may be) is pure human arrogance. Jesus the Christ is an example, a role model for humanity. A level to be aquired, if you will. Jesus attempted to explain to humanity that physicallity was only one small part of existance. Christ attempted to show humanity how one could exist before birth and after death, how death (no matter how brutal) was a small thing.
Judas was sent to bring the soldiers of Roman Catholic decent to slay a Son of God (aka Man) who was an Angel and a prophet. To Romans it was proof of divinity for the Roman throne, 'Yes, our Emporor is great. He has slain the massiah who was sent by the God of the Jews who is said to be all powerfull' and this act created the Pope (who does not answer to God, but directs God and the people). And in this time we will see this officer fall as the people rise up.
These soliers then carried Christ through the streets where the Jews spit on him and threw stones. As he walked the believers saw a lamb carried to slaughter. The Jews affirmed that this man was not the messiah, for what kind of chosen one would allow this degredation of his being. And in this time we will see violence become the downfall of non-believers.
Those who believed in Christ watched their prophet brutalized. They did nothing to save him, they did not speak out, they did not identify themselves as followers of Christ. They hid, they wept and they mourned. This acceptance of defeat caused them to become the "meek". In this time we will see them reap what they have sown.
There were those who were disciples. They are still moving in divine meditation. They have the message. Jesus the Christ gathered together those who would know and comprehend. Through them the Word still speaks.
And then there are the forgotten and left behind. The mother of Christ who had her child ripped away and killed for the sake of God's message. She who never failed to believe. She who was brutilized and spit on, forgotten and marginalized, left for dead. Deified and sanctified only for the time it took to carry a child in her womb, then promptly disregaurded because her gender was concidered unholy.
Those who remember Mary still forget Joseph. Joseph who married a pregnant woman, who's baby was not his. Who kept her secret, who raised her child, who was silent.
Jesus the Christ was a scholar and a world traveler. Jesus did not die for "our sins", Christ lived for our benefit.
Whatever really happened was enough to start time over again. For thousands of years time passed fairly uninturupted. Then one day, sometime after the death of a Man written about in nearly every Holy book, someone said ok, time starts now. And for the most part the whole rest of the world agreed.
How many years are there between B.C. and A.D.? does anyone have the answer to that? And what happened to make time restart because of it.
And most importantly what does that have to do with the times we are living in?
That's what I want to know.
|
|
