Greetings in the name of the most high Jah!! Rastafari.
@IPXninja
InI give thanks for the clarification, and to di I for digging deeper.
> Sometimes I jokingly refer to Google as a manner of god because,
> in a manner of speaking, it is omniscient. Again... in a manner
> of speaking.
I don't know about this one Idren, knowledge does not automatically
imply divinity. Knowledge very much depends on memory. This reminds
InI of the Turing Test, Google is indistinguishable from a human and
much more intelligent then human in terms of memory and computation.
> One could say that our concept of "God" is really determined by the
> interpretation of old stories which were based on the thoughts and
> superstitions of ancient people.
There is only one God and that is Haile Selassie I alongside Empress
Menen I, divine union of Iration, yes I Rastafari is the head creator.
> How is the brain "conscious"?...
InI is speaking about a different type of consciousness. Forget the
brain, mind or individual for a moment, is it possible to be conscious
without any references (memory, thoughts) not even time (past,
future) can computers reach this level of awareness, simply being,
with no attachments. Can computers truly taste bliss that comes from
just being aware?
InI always say that if AI can be conscious then every human can
voluntarily feel happiness (or any other emotion) anytime anywhere.
Everything in a computer depends on symbols, we cannot symbolize
happiness with language we can only describe it to others but that is
not the same as experiencing it. In other words if AI can be conscious
it would mean we have the ability to induce experience (describe a
moment or even emotion to someone with word and they would experience
it).
Also in bliss when the individual disappears all individuals in the
world disappear and only the oneness of creation is left.
This cannot be overstood with logic, so providing a proof of this
difficult.
> And so, in a "manner of speaking", Google being able to communicate
> with all these servers, each one having stored memories of human
> knowledge and experience, it functions much like a brain that hosts
> the sum total of human knowledge.
Time is a concept of the mind, to map the states of consciousness/
experience, the past is dead and gone, the future is not yet here only
now exist, experiencing now. InI minds try to fragment creation
because of Ego, time is arbitrary.
> If an AI is able to learn at a rate as fast as all the processors
> it can access, then a similar thing could be true and the whole of
> the internet could become its brain by distributing its neural
> pathways using these same connections between servers. Instead of
> it having to "ask Google", it would index websites itself with its
> own algorithm that it can continue to upgrade.
> And because of "clock speed" the AI could operate at a speed that
> would almost defy the human understanding of time because we would
> be moving and thinking much slower in comparison.
Yes, 100% agree with this. AI can be better brain, humans have no
match in terms of memory, computation (mechanical number crunching).
Computers will always be better then InI at fragmenting consciousness.
Jah Rastafari Idens and Itection!
|
|