If Darwin ever called something less evolved or more evolved, I don't agree with him, because there's no such thing. We all adapted to fit our environment. Humans could consider something more or less evolved, but that's only based on our own ideas of what makes an organism "important" or not, depending on our own values. We happen to value intelligence, invention, etc, which is no wonder, since these are traits that relate to our own survival... but an owl might value different traits such as the sense of sight, or a bat might value sense of hearing more, and consider us "less evolved".
The thing is, you seem to be asserting that man is more important or advanced than other animals, which is essentially the same as "more evolved". You feel insulted by being compared to other animals on this earth. And that I do not respect, because we all share this earth, and human dignity doesn't have to come at the expense of every other animal. This is why I have no interest in the spiritual or mystical, but what actually exists in reality.
I looked up "Cambrian explosion", bro that's before dinosaurs. If you're trying to find mankind that far back, good luck to you.
|
|