How does I overstand the contradiction of human ownership in Exodus? In the same book where I and I escaped slavery from Egypt, rules are set forth to I and I on how slavery is to operate from Exodus 21:2:
“When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing.
much of this goes on to describe the rules of a slaves children becoming his master's property and that selling your daughter is allowed and the punishments for any person to lose a limb for a limb or tooth for a tooth.
and then it goes onto say from Exodus 21:20-21:
"When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be avenged. But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his money.”
;;
Is this is a symptom of the Towel of Babel? I and I know that JAH know slavery is not livity, how do I and I defend against the advocation of Biblical slavery? How does JAH word corrupt and then seem to balance with JAH-Love?
Do I and I simply seek an overstanding to the context of history and push to a livolution of higher livication to overstand the True JAH-Love, how do I and I interpret this segment of ripture. Are human writers of the Bible just flawed to express what is an extinct tradition of culture or is this a way to bridge a divide and repentance to the Egyptian master that I and I were freed from? Do I and I view this as a misinterpretation? I seek to know because a breda felt discouragment and word of corruption from de Holy Book. I too feel religion is no spirit of JAH but a building of selffish and unwise man.
|
|