This so-called story supposedly starts with Abraham, who led the semitic Aryan-hyksos(historically RE- classified as the ‘children of israel’) from northern Mesopotamia(iraq) because of famine. At this point there’s an unaccountable time gap, and then as the story goes this group “settles” in “Egypt(KEMET)” as 70 shepherds divided into 12 tribes. First of all, there is no such thing as “SETTLED”. In the real sense of the word, settle means invade-kill-steal. Never in the human “times” of this world has a NON- African (foreign) group left their territorial habitation and went to foreign lands (AFRICA) with the intent of subscribing to that indigenous lands ideology and method of social and spiritual structure. Instead, they either come to implement their own foreign ideologies to the people of that land, or as was the case of Abraham, the people was mentally deficient and incapable of consciously digesting the intricate system of MAAT. THE REASON IS TO JUSTIFY THEIR MALICIOUS INTENT WHICH IS STEALING THE RICH LAND, THE MINERALS THAT COME WITH THE LAND, AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE WHO INHABIT THE LAND. The bottom line is: settlers have always been ‘greedy and murderous’ foreign invaders.
Now, as the “story” goes the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites or children of Israel), claimed to be wandering migrants who under the leadership of Abraham moved to caanan (present day Palestine-israel) somewhere around 1800bce. The story twist at that point and the focus turns to abraham’s second son Isaac who for some strange reason decides to change his name to jacob. Then, as the “story” goes, jacob’s son joseph is sold by his brothers into slavery in Kemet. There he ultimately becomes a vice-regent and sends for all seventy of his immediate relatives to live in Kemet in high governmental positions. The fact of the matter is that entire episode is a bare-faced lie, constructed by the semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites) for the purposed of recruiting sympathetic support from white barbarians and other sea-peoples (Hittites, greeks, Assyrians, philistines, etc.), who now separated themselves from the hyksos movement and was in the process of structuring their own new agenda toward advancing militarily inside Kemet. Now to find out what is fact and what is fraud, all we have to do is match the verbal accusations and proclamations. The key is simple, if and when truth can be proven; it remains truth. If and when the construct of a lie cannot be justified, it remains a lie. The time period in which the accusations cover must be traced. The mind-set of the African-accused, and the political, spiritual, and social structure of the African-accused must be traced for validity. Also, events, accomplishments, and circumstances involving the African-group (Kemetians/Egyptians) whose character is held in defamation by this “historical” jew-tale must be traced. Once traced for validity, the weight of the truth-scale can only tip in favor of African truth, OR semitic Aryan-hyksos (Israelites)FRAUD!
"The story told in the Bible concerning the exodus doesn’t fit, so we have no choice but to convict. The information doesn’t fit, so we must convict. We must convict the writer of Exodus for telling a story that contradicts itself and doesn’t add up regarding names, times, or dates. If the accused writer is found guilty, the punishment shall be the telling of the truth. This, of course, means that many items will have to be omitted and placed in the Bible for the ordinary reader to know the truth. Its is doubtful if the writer of the book of Exodus knew anything about what he was writing. The story of the Exodus is a version of obvious interpolations and omissions and mistakes of editors and scribes, who lived many centuries after the events recorded in it. Josephus connected the Exodus with the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt, and he is very likely right."
THE HEBREW JEW