FYI - I'm with ALL of the Idem on the DARWIN FIRE
- He was a battyman racist. BURN Darwin.....
For I, his theory was (partially) right but his conclusions were all off
EXAMPLE - IF Humans developed from a primate ancestor, and white people developed from black people - DARWINS conclusions was that the white man was the superior form of the black man. Whereas black people of the world today, had for some reason stopped evolving,
?what a pumplex.......
Surely (using his logics) the white man would be a superior / more evolved form of the black man of 100,000 years ago who left Africa. I can give him that for the sake of this reasoning. But at the same time IN Africa what he failed to realise is that the black man DID continue to develop genetically, in ways which are different to that of mere skin colour. What I am saying is, the black man of today, genetically (name any tribe you want) is NOT the same black man as 100,000 years ago.
Evidence: Put a Northern European in the DR Congo without sunblock and see how long he lasts with his 'superior' self.
Evidence no 2: Anyone remember Hitlers group of Super Whites and whe did happen at the Olympic games?
Darwin said because the 'Africans' he allegedly encountered had a 'primitive language' inferior to that of the complex European languages, the European must be the superior, and more evolved. He clearly didn't realise the very European language he was using was a simplified form of more Incient African COMPLEX languages and glyphs. Which using his logics would make the European less superior than the Africans of 5,000 years ago.
Darwins second error was assuming that natural selection is the only process involved in Evolution. And didn't account for genetic mutation (a mutant is not necessarily a 'superior') and human interacting (sex) with other Hominids such as the Neanderthal.
In closing, **** Darwin,.
He also said we all 'come from' Monkeys which again is completely against what current Evolution theories suggest.
|
|
