>>Ras Tafari<< ------------------------- Homepage RasTafarI Words ------------------------- >>Marcus Garvey<< ------------------------- Marcus Words

>>Itations<< ------------------------- Ocean Who is RasTafarI ONE Faith Other Itations...

>>Inity<< ------------------------- Sign-In ------------------------- Bible Search Kebra Negast ------------------------- RasTafarI Forum RasTafarI Links Zion King Website ------------------------- Contact Ark I

Use the drop-down boxes above to navigate through the Website

Return to Reasoning List

---

Here is a link to this page:
http://www.jah-rastafari.com/forum/message-view.asp?message_group=5789&start_row=1

Out of Africa Theory Debunked???

1 - 10

11 - 20

21 - 30

31 - 40

41 - 49

Time Zone: EST (New York, Toronto)

Messenger: VoodooRuutz Sent: 8/18/2014 9:50:37 PM

Russian geneticists "claim" to have proven the 'Out of Africa' theory false, what say d I's? supposedly published in 'Advancements in Anthropology'. Just came across this!

Messenger: Ark I Sent: 8/19/2014 12:41:16 AM

I have read some some things that have come through continued genetic research saying that present day humans are a mixture of mostly homo sapiens and other humans, some known like, Neanderthal, Denisovans, Homo floresiensis and others; and also other types of humans not yet identified in fossil records, but identified through DNA. Researchers say that non-African people share between 1-5% DNA with Neanderthals, but that number can be misleading. For all humans today, 99.9% of our genes are the same, the 1-5% mentioned above is applied to the remaining 1%. So if a person is said to have 3% Neanderthal DNA, that translates to 0.003% of their total DNA. Scientists understand some things, but there is still a lot more to understand. It is too early in the knowledge to be firm about the exact make up of genetic history of humans today. I Sight all of I and I as humans, as brothers and sisters, no matter how far back our common mother and father is. It is Oneness, same way. That is the mindset that Haile Selassie I has shown I and I through various speeches and through His Example, and I Trod has shown I the same.

Messenger: RAS NATE Sent: 8/19/2014 5:23:41 AM

Darwin's THEORY is also proven false and imposible by science itself.That's why it will always be a theory and not a law. Time can't just turn apes into modern men.No matter how long. BUN Darwin.

Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 9:44:47 AM

Don't know king. All of I sources are very much in agreement with the OOA theory. And white people have been trying to write themselves into the 'origin' of mankind since I can remember. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140129-neanderthal-genes-genetics-migration-africa-eurasian-science/ One more thing which seems to be commonly misoverstood, a scientific theory is not just an 'idea' that somebody comes up with for what 'could' have happened. That would make it a hypothesis. A scientific theory has to be tried, tested, peer reviewed and evaluated before it is accepted as science. Darwin is a clear racist. And his conclusions he drew from his science were way up there in the realms of white supremacy. But the theory itself - evolution - all living things having common ancestors, makes perfect sense to I. We were either here on the planet forever...... or we must have evolved from something, as did the earth, sun and moon.....

Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 9:58:47 AM

I found the article. Nothing has been 'debunked' To I it just confirms that all white people are not descended directly from black people. There were other 'humanoids' around during early humanity which the European encountered and often mated with. Producing a new set of genetics. Which has largely been 'reabsorbed' into the global human family genome giving the percentages of difference which Ark I mentions. Still has not refuted humanity beginning in Africa. I have brethren who are very much into this side of science and will keep you updated if I hear any more. Peace!

Messenger: VoodooRuutz Sent: 8/19/2014 10:08:55 AM

Bless! Yeh it was d article I a talk.

Messenger: VoodooRuutz Sent: 8/19/2014 10:16:14 AM

How much % a genes do apes share with humans? Is it 96-99%? If so then are they one race wit we?

Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 10:24:21 AM

I've seen dem numbers yeah. But there is more to the definition of Race than genetics

Messenger: RAS NATE Sent: 8/19/2014 12:18:54 PM

Yet,there is no actual proof evolution is possible.. In fact there are many scientific facts wich prove the theory to be false. There are many more if the I them search.But let I post Ten facts: ------------------------------------------------------------ Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong ;;; ;;; Help! I can't fly. My head is too big, and my wings are too small. The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless? The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense. Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a Link Proves Evolution is Wrong The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. Humans are a great example. There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes and elephants. These pictures are placed in all evolutionists' text books to teach kids this nonsense. The picture is simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution. ;;; ;;; Scientific Fact No. 3 - Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals. Scientific Fact No. 4 - Human Egg and Sperm Proves Evolution is Wrong The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The female egg contains the X-chromosome and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a male or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a female. The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain. However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change. Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons. Scientific Fact No. 5 - DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong ;;; ;;; The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed. Scientific Fact No. 6 - Chaos From Organization Proves Evolution is Wrong The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof. Evolution is simply an empty theory. Scientific Fact No. 7 - Chromosome Count Proves Evolution is Wrong There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible. Evolutionists prove that getting a college education does not impart wisdom. Scientific Fact No. 8 - Origin of Matter and Stars Proves Evolution is Wrong Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang" theory doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere. Scientific Fact No. 9 - Lack of Life on Mars Proves Evolution is Wrong Two NASA two land rovers named Spirit and Opportunity explored Mars during 2004. The topography shows obvious signs of past liquid rivers flowing in numerous places. The rovers have proven that water was once abundant on the surface of Mars, but they have not been able to find any signs of life or any signs of past life on the planet. Mars has a proven history of flowing water on the surface and an atmosphere suitable to support life forms. The planet has had all of the conditions necessary to provide the "spark" of life according to the evolutionary theory, yet there is no life on Mars. The river beds and river banks show no signs of vegetation or trees. The ground has no fossils and no organisms. The place is absolutely sterile. Scientific Fact No. 10 - Radio Silence from Space Proves Evolution is Wrong Mars is not the only place that shows no signs of life. The entire universe lacks any sign of life. There are no radio signals that can be related to intelligent life forms. None of the billions of galaxies has been found to emit any intelligent radio signals. Scientists have been pointing every type of radio telescope possible into space for several decades in hopes of finding an intelligent signal. No signs of life beyond Earth have been found. We are alone. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread163678/pg1 --------------------------------------------------------- I personally see evolution as Babylon folly and can't Iverstand how some Rasta people can even consider the posibility.Not coz I think InI should have closed minds or must believe in the Bible.But becoz InI know that the first Rastaman to trod JAH earth was not an ape.

Messenger: GARVEYS AFRICA Sent: 8/19/2014 12:24:30 PM

King, have you ever heard of antibiotic resistance? When a bacteria grows resistant to a particular form of antibiotic? This is micro-evolution which is recordable, measurable and witnessed daily. To not believe in evolution would be to suggest we were here, as is, forever. Going back to a biblical genesis story 'And on this day God made man'....... re: what you posted, how old is this? Mars famously DOES show signs of life, with evidence of prehistoric water/oceans on Mars. It is currently overstood all life forms on THIS planet developed Millions of years ago from early bacteria/ pathogens which developed from the first waters which came after the earth developed. So to find water on Mars is an indicator of life. It doesn't seem as tho this article was actually written by somebody who is into science. For example it keeps on claiming that evolution says man come from monkeys....... which isn't the claim. Monkeys and man have a common progenitor or ancestor isn't the same as saying we come from monkeys. How would one explain the different Haplogroups found throughout humanity, if not for Evolution? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microevolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_A_(Y-DNA)

1 - 10

11 - 20

21 - 30

31 - 40

41 - 49

---

Return to Reasoning List

RastafarI

Haile Selassie I