One point I keep repeating is
Rasta (I don't know if you call yourself a rasta) rasta keep telling I that them use the bible because jah used the bible. BUT the enslavers of InI used the bible the same way. The point is how one interprets the bible. Not the actual text. Despite Rastas using the same book as his majesty I fail to overstand how a rasta can claim like he is interpreting the book in the same way as HIM. HIM never read the ible and declared himself as he almighty. Well maybe he did but we are yet to hear him make such a statement. When he referred to Jesus he spoke in the 3rd person not as though it was himself or the same person - which is how many rasta see it. So the fact you use the same book is very good but if your drawing different interpretations I don't see the whole point?
Secondly, HIM for most of what we have seen did not have dreadlocks, and as far as we know may not have been ital.
It is not what is on his head, nor what he eats, nor his religious 'beliefs' why (most) Rasta say Rasta. Look deeper. I look to his title, his throne, his country, and significantly, his personality. - which I believe to be preset regardless of his religious persuasion.
You know there are many none Christian people in Ethiopia and within His Majesty's family?
(On a side note, somebody remind me of the name of his Islamic cousin he had to slaughter because of betrayal? I've not been able to think of the name for some time , you know when something annoys you them way deh?)
Haile I
|
|