Ten: "Yes RSK I mean the Cross", the point I was making is that is was not a cross, THE SCRIPTURES SAID IT WAS A TREE!
-RSK
This is an excerpt from an article from DGT
"RELIGIOUS LINKS
The cross evolved from the ancient KMTic symbol the Ankh. Originally, in Akebulan (earlier word for Afrika), the use of the cross was meant for 'peace of the divine spirit'. But YT, not fully overstanding 360° of KMTic know-ledge, they reversed the meaning and used it as a mark for death. Easter is s'posed to mark the resurrection of the biblical Jesus (I say 'biblical' because there is strong evidence he did not exist and that is story is but a replica of the first Jesus, betta known as, Heru, whose parents were Ausar and Auset. Read the works of Gerald Massey's, The Historical Jesus and the Mythical Christ, for example), who was allegedly killed on a cross. But if you read Act 10:38-41, it talks of him being lynched: "...how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him. And we are witnesses of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem, whom they killed by hanging on a tree. Him God raised up on the third day, and showed Him openly. Not to all the people, but to witnesses chosen before by God, even to us who ate and drank with Him after He arose from the dead." I don't hear anything about him being on a cross. This whole notion of the cross also raises a point of just when did the lynching of Afrikan people began, which may be the Romanz, definitely not the Ku Klux Klan!
|
|