not implying that at'all, just bringing out some evidence that seems to be overlQQked
there are many who are justly convicted, but many who are not
the biggest injustice is the falsity of requiring a "jury of one's peers" knowing good and well that the jury pool rarely represents the peer group of the accused; this is not just related to race (its socioeconomic, cultural, spiritual, etc.)
my response was specifically because it was implyed that because those 3 were arrested and convicted, and supposedly were NOI, that made the NOI guilty
never were any conspirators prosecuted THAT'S AN INJUSTICE!
3 questions: who benefited from it? who did it? who covered up the conspiracy? CERTAINLY NOT THOSE 3 ALONE!
greetings to you both, and I hope this clears up my point
RSK- one luv
|
|